AFFAIRE E.S. ET AUTRES CONTRE LA REPUBLIQUE SLOVAQUE

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2012) 50 [1] Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului E.S. și altele împotriva Republicii Slovace Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede că el supraveghează executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumită în continuare "convenția" și "Curtea") [2] Având în vedere hotărârea de mai jos, care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului odată ce a devenit definitiv Numele cauzei (referitor la cerere) Hotărârea Definitivului E.S. și altele (8227/04) 15/09/2009 15/12/2009 Reamintind că constatările de încălcare făcute de Curte impun, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate în hotărâri, adoptarea de către statul membru pârât, dacă este necesar, a unor măsuri individuale care să pună capăt încălcărilor și să șteargă, pe cât posibil, consecințele acestora pentru solicitant, precum și măsuri generale care să permită prevenirea unor încălcări similare; După ce a invitat autoritățile din statul pârât să furnizeze un plan de acțiune privind măsurile propuse pentru executarea hotărârii; după ce a examinat, în conformitate cu normele Comitetului privind aplicarea articolului 46 alineatul (2) din convenție, bilanțul de acțiune furnizat de guvern (a se vedea bilanțul de acțiune, documentul DH-DD(2012)129E [3] după ce a luat act de faptul că Statul pârât a plătit părții reclamante satisfacția echitabilă prevăzută în hotărârea pronunțată; DECURSĂ că acesta și-a îndeplinit funcțiile în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din convenție în această cauză și DECIDE d Această rubrică se referă la o failure of the domestic authorities to take apte measures in 2001 to protect the applicants from il-treatment (fizical and sexual abuze) inpolited by theirs husband and father, and a coresponding failure to meet the pozitiv obligation to respect their family and privatate life (violation of Articles 3 and 8). I. Payment of just satisfaction and individual measures a) Details of just satisfaction Pecuniary damage Non-pecuniary damage Cost and expenses Total 000 EUR 000 EUR Paid on 28/01/2010 b) Individual measures The applicants received just satisfaction for moraly damages. If similar problems with the first applicicants husband area again, the aplicants can benefit from the changes to the law described under the general measures. No other individual Measures seem to be necessary. II. General Measures a) Legislation The legislative changes were made before the judgment of the European Court has been adopted. The rent law of the Slovak Republic meets the requirements of the European Convention. As of 1 January 2003 the court may, under section 76 § 1(g) of the Code of Civil Procedure, through an interim measure impun upon the party not to enter temporily a house or an apartment ocupated by a close person or person in his/her care or education in relation to whom there are reasons for he/she being suspected of violence. As of 1 January 2003, under Secțiunea 705a of the Civil Code, if a further coabitation is un suportable due to the fizical or mental using an apartment, based on a motion of one of a married cuplu or formand married cuplu the court can limita a right of use of the other of a married cuplu or formand married cuplu or totally from the right of her/him from the right of use of an apartament. Under Secțiunea 712a § 8 in fin of the Civil Code, if a forma husband, during the mariaj or after the divorț of the maririage committed the psihical or mental violence against the other from a mariried cuplu or against the close person living with him in apartment, the court shall decide that he is not entitled to a substitut dwelling. Under the new legislation interim measures are available to ensure that the authorities would be pote to act quickly. There is no need to adoption legislative changes or other measures b) Publication and disemination The judgment was publicished in the Judicial Review (Justidne Review) ) No. 12/2009, the juridical jurnal distributed to al scurts in the Slovak Republic and available also for subscribers. III. Concluzii of the respondent state The Government consider that the measures adopted have fully remedied the consecvences for the aplicants of the violation of the Convention found by the European Court in this case, that these measures will prevent similar viols and that the Slovak Republic has thus compliment with its obligations under art. 46 alineatul (1) of the Convention. In Bratislava. 1 February 2012 Marica Pirošíková Agent al Government of the Slovak Republic before the European Court of Human Rights [1] Adoptată de Comitetul de Miniștri la 8 martie 2012 în cadrul celei de-a 1136-a reuniuni a delegaților miniștrilor. [2] a se vedea, de asemenea, recomandările adoptate de Comitetul de Miniștri în cadrul supravegherii hotărârilor Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului, în special Recomandarea Rec.,2004)6 al Comitetului miniștrilor din statele membre privind îmbunătățirea căilor de atac interne. [3] Doar documentul în limba engleză

Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)50

[1]

Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme

E.S. et autres contre République slovaque

Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit qu’il surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «

la Convention

» et «

la Cour

»)

[2]

,

Vu l’arrêt ci-dessous, qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité une fois qu’il est devenu définitif

;

Nom de l’affaire (réf. requête)

Arrêt du

Définitif le

E.S. et autres (8227/04)

15/09/2009

15/12/2009

Rappelant que les constats de violation faits par la Cour exigent, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée dans les arrêts, l’adoption par l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire, de mesures individuelles mettant fin aux violations et effaçant autant que possible les conséquences de celles-ci pour le requérant, et de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ;

Ayant invité les autorités de l’Etat défendeur à fournir un plan d’action concernant les mesures proposées pour exécuter l’arrêt;

Ayant examiné, conformément aux Règles du Comité pour l’application de l’article 46, paragraphe

2, de la Convention, le bilan d’action fourni par le gouvernement (voir le bilan d’action, document

DH-DD(2012)129E

)

[3]

;

Ayant noté que

l’Etat défendeur a versé à la partie requérante la satisfaction équitable prévue dans l’arrêt ;

DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et

DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.

ACTION REPORT

App. No. 8227104

E. S. and others v. Slovakia, judgment of 15/09/2009, final on 15/12/2009

Introductory case summary

This case concerns a failure of the domestic authorities to take appropriate measures in 2001 to protect the applicants from ill-treatment (physical and sexual abuse) inflicted by theirs husband and father, and a corresponding failure to meet the positive obligation to respect their family and private life (violation of Articles 3 and 8).

I. Payment of just satisfaction and individual measures

a) Details of just satisfaction

Pecuniary damage

Non-pecuniary damage

Cost and expenses

Total

8

000 euros

2

000 euros

10

000 euros

Paid on 28/01/2010

b) Individual measures

The applicants received just satisfaction for non-pecuniary damages. If similar problems with the first applicant’s husband arise again, the applicants can benefit from the changes to the law described under the general measures. No other individual measures seem to be necessary.

II. General measures

a) Legislation

The legislative changes were made before the judgment of the European Court has been adopted. The recent law of the Slovak Republic meets the requirements of the European Convention. As of 1

January 2003 the court may, under Section 76 § 1(g) of the Code of Civil Procedure, through an interim measure impose upon the party not to enter temporarily a house or an apartment occupied by a close person or person in his/her care or education in relation to whom there are reasons for he/she being suspected of violence. As of 1 January 2003, under Section 705a of the Civil Code, if a further cohabitation is unsupportable due to the physical or mental violence or threats of such violence from a husband or former husband, which is the joint user of an apartment, or from a close person jointly using an apartment, based on a motion of one of a married couple or former married couple the court can limit a right of use of the other of a married couple or former married couple or exclude her/him totally from the right of use of an apartment. Under Section 712a § 8 in fine of the Civil Code, if a former husband, during the marriage or after the divorce of the marriage committed the psychical or mental violence against the other from a married couple or against the close person living with him in an apartment, the court shall decide that he is not entitled to a substitute dwelling. Under the new legislation interim measures are available to ensure that the authorities would be able to act quickly. Therefore, there is no need to adopt legislative changes or other measures

b) Publication and dissemination

The judgment was published in the Judicial Revue (

Justidne Revue

) No. 12/2009, the juridical journal distributed to ail courts in the Slovak Republic and available also for subscribers.

III. Conclusions of the respondent state

The Government consider that the measures adopted have fully remedied the consequences for the applicants of the violation of the Convention found by the European Court in this case, that these measures will prevent similar violations and that the Slovak Republic has thus complied with its obligations under Article 46 § 1 of the Convention.

In Bratislava. 1 February 2012

Marica Pirošíková

Agent of the Government of the Slovak Republic before the European Court of Human Rights

[1]

Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 8 mars 2012 lors de la 1136e réunion des Délégués des Ministres.

[2]

voir aussi les recommandations adoptées par le Comité des Ministres dans le cadre de la supervision des arrêts de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme, et en particulier la Recommandation

Rec(2004)6 du Comité des Ministres aux Etats membres sur l'amélioration des recours internes.

[3]

Document en anglais uniquement