AFFAIRE AL-KHAWAJA ET TAHERY CONTRE LE ROYAUME-UNI

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2012)229 [1] Al Khawaja împotriva Regatului Unit Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (Recherche n 26766/05, Hotărârea din 15 decembrie 2011, Marea Cameră) Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede că el supraveghează executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumite în continuare "menționate mai jos " Convenția" și "Curtea"), Având în vedere hotărârea definitivă, care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului în cauza de mai sus și încălcarea constatată (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012)771E care reamintește obligația de a se adresa Tribunalului, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (1) (1) din Convenție, să se conformeze hotărârilor definitive în litigiile la care este parte și că această obligație implică, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte, adoptarea de către autoritățile din statul membru în cauză, dacă este necesar de măsuri individuale pentru a pune capăt încălcărilor constatate și pentru a elimina consecințele acestora, în măsura posibilului de către Restitutio in integrum ; și măsuri generale de prevenire a unor încălcări similare ; Am invitat guvernul statului pârât să informeze Comitetul cu privire la măsurile luate pentru a se conforma obligațiilor menționate anterior După examinarea bilanțului de acțiune furnizat de guvern care indică măsurile adoptate în vederea executării hotărârii judecătorești, inclusiv informațiile furnizate în ceea ce privește plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012)771E SÕ, asigurându-se că au fost adoptate toate măsurile prevăzute la art. 46 alineatul (1); DECLAMENTUL pe care l-a îndeplinit în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenție în această cauză și DECIDE d . . Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Action Report [2] Tahery v The United Kingdom (Case Al-Khawaja and Tahery No. 26766/05) (Aplicația nr. 22228/06; Judgment final la 19 decembrie 2011) Information submitted by the United Kingdom Government on 8 June 2012 Case Summary Case description: The aplicant Mr Tahery alleged that his trial for wounding with intent to commit Grievous bodily harm in 2005 had been unfair befause the statement of one witness, who feared astepting trial, was read to the juriului. The Court held that there had been a violation of Article 6§1 read in conjunction with Article 6§3(d) of the Convention in respect of Mr. Tahery. Individual Measures Doar satisfaction: The just satisfaction award of €18,000 has been paid and evidence implored. Individual Measures: Government considers no further individual measures to be necessary. It is open to Mr Tahery to make an application to the Criminal Cases Review Commission for review of his case. General Measures General Measures The Government considers no general measures to be necessary. The judgment is limited to its specialfacts. The Grand Chamber stated in their decision that mail... the safeguards contained in the 1988 and 2003 Acts, supported by those contained in section 78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act and the common law, are, in principle, strong safeguards designed to ensure fairness (paragraph 151). Publicație: The judgment has been publicised in the following locations: The British and Irish Legal Information Institute website at http://www.leandii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2011/2127.html The UK Human Rights Blog website at http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2011/12/15/use-of-hearsay-evidence-does-not-automatally-prevent-a-fair-trial-rulles-strasburg/ Criminal Law and Justice Weekly Publication at http://www.criminallawandjustice.co.uk/index.php?/Analysis/absent-witnesses-al-khawaja-revisited.html Blackstone mais Criminal Practice Newsletter at http://www.oup.com/uk/booksites/content/9780199694464/further/dec_11/Dissemination: The judgment has also been disseminated to the English and Welsh judiciary via the judicial intranet. State of execution of judgment The Government considers that all necessary measures have been taken and that the case should be closed. [1] Adoptată de Comitetul de Miniștri la 6 decembrie 2012 cu ocazia celei de-a 1157-a reuniuni a Delegaților miniștrilor. [2] Numai în limba engleză.

Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)229

[1]

Al Khawaja contre Royaume-Uni

Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme

(Requête n

o

26766/05, arrêt du 15 décembre 2011, Grande Chambre)

Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit qu’il surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «

la Convention

» et «

la Cour

»),

Vu l’arrêt définitif, qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité dans l’affaire ci-dessus et la violation constatée (voir document

DH-DD(2012)771E

)

;

Rappelant l’obligation de l’Etat défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe

1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels il est partie et que cette obligation implique, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour, l’adoption par les autorités de l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire

:

-

de mesures individuelles pour mettre fin aux violations constatées et en effacer les conséquences, dans la mesure du possible par

restitutio in integrum

; et

-

de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ;

Ayant invité le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur à informer le Comité des mesures prises pour se conformer aux obligations susmentionnées

;

Ayant examiné le bilan d’action fourni par le Gouvernement indiquant les mesures adoptées afin d’exécuter l’arrêt y compris les informations fournies en ce qui concerne le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour (voir document

DH-DD(2012)771E

)

;

S’étant assuré que toutes les mesures requises par l’article 46, paragraphe 1, ont été adoptées

;

DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et

DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.

Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights

Action Report

[2]

Tahery v The United Kingdom (Case Al-Khawaja and Tahery No.

26766/05)

(Application no. 22228/06; judgment final on 19 December 2011)

Information submitted by the United Kingdom Government on 8 June 2012

Case Summary

1.

Case description:

-

The applicant Mr Tahery alleged that his trial for wounding with intent to commit grievous bodily harm in 2005 had been unfair because the statement of one witness, who feared attending trial, was read to the jury.

-

The Court held that there had been a violation of Article 6§1 read in conjunction with Article 6§3(d) of the Convention in respect of Mr Tahery.

Individual Measures

2.

Just satisfaction:

-

The just satisfaction award of €18,000 has been paid and evidence supplied.

3.

Individual measures:

-

The Government considers no further individual measures to be necessary. It is open to Mr Tahery to make an application to the Criminal Cases Review Commission for review of his case.

General Measures

4.

General Measures

-

The Government considers no general measures to be necessary. The judgment is confined to its specific facts. The Grand Chamber stated in their decision that “... the safeguards contained in the 1988 and 2003 Acts, supported by those contained in section 78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act and the common law, are, in principle, strong safeguards designed to ensure fairness” (paragraph 151).

-

5.

Publication:

-

The judgment has been publicised in the following locations:

The British and Irish Legal Information Institute website at

http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2011/2127.html

The UK Human Rights Blog website at

http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2011/12/15/use-of-hearsay-evidence-does-not-automatically-prevent-a-fair-trial-rules-strasbourg/

Criminal Law and Justice Weekly publication at

http://www.criminallawandjustice.co.uk/index.php?/Analysis/absent-witnesses-al-khawaja-revisited.html

Blackstone’s Criminal Practice Bulletin at

http://www.oup.com/uk/booksites/content/9780199694464/further/dec_11/

6.

Dissemination:

-

The judgment has also been disseminated to the English and Welsh judiciary via the judicial intranet.

7.

State of execution of judgment

-

The Government considers that all necessary measures have been taken and that the case should be closed.

[1]

Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 6 décembre 2012 lors de la 1157e réunion des Délégués des Ministres.

[2]

En anglais uniquement.