AFFAIRE J.M. CONTRE LE ROYAUME-UNI

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2012)231 [1] J.M. împotriva Regatului Unit Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (Recherche n 37060/06, Hotărârea din 28 septembrie 2010, definitivă la 28 decembrie 2010) Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede că el supraveghează executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumite în continuare "menționate mai jos " Convenția" și "Curtea"), Având în vedere hotărârea definitivă, care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului în cauza de mai sus și încălcarea constatată (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012) 937E reamintind obligația de a se adresa Tribunalului, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (3) (1) din Convenție, să se conformeze hotărârilor definitive în litigiile la care este parte și că această obligație implică, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte, adoptarea de către autoritățile din statul membru în cauză, dacă este necesar de măsuri individuale pentru a pune capăt încălcărilor constatate și pentru a elimina consecințele acestora, în măsura posibilului de către Restitutio in integrum ; și măsuri generale de prevenire a unor încălcări similare ; Am invitat guvernul statului pârât să informeze Comitetul cu privire la măsurile luate pentru a se conforma obligațiilor menționate anterior După examinarea bilanțului de acțiune furnizat de guvern care indică măsurile adoptate în vederea executării hotărârii judecătorești, inclusiv informațiile furnizate în ceea ce privește plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012) 937E FIȘĂ fiind asigurat că au fost adoptate toate măsurile prevăzute la art. 46 alineatul (1); DECLAMENTUL pe care l-a îndeplinit în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenție în această cauză și DECIDE d . . Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Action Report [2] JM v The United Kingdom (aplicația nr. 37060/06; judgment final on 28/12/2010) Information submitted by the United Kingdom Government on 10 October 2011 Case Summary Case description The case involved an absent mother who was in a same sex relationship. As the non-residence part she was required to contribute towards her childrens upbring and in 2001 the legislation provided for a reduced amount when the absent parinte was in a relationship, but toook no account of same sex relations. The European Court of Human Rights held that there had been a incalca of Article 14 ECHR in conjunction with Article 1 Protocol 1 EHR. Individual Measures Justice the just satisfaction award has been paid; evidence attached. General Measures General Measures The Government considers no further general measures are necessary chause the discrimination complaint in this case has already been resolved by means of legislation mains the Civil Partnership Act 2004 and subordinate legislation. This amended the legislation to provide that, in the relevant situation, same sex relationships are taken into account in an equivalent way to relationships between persons of the opozant sex. Publication: The judgment has been publicshed in: All England Law Reports: [2010] All ER (D) 51 (Oct) http://lexisweb.co.uk/cases/2010/September/JM-v-United-Kingdom British and Irish Legal Information Institute Database: [2010] ECHR 1361 http://www.leandii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/1361.html Disemination: The Government considers it is unnecessary to diseminate the judgment ciocause the law has already been changed (infact, some considerable time ago mais Civil Partnerships Act 2004 and subordinate legislation) and so highlighting the previous legislation would be unnecessary and confuzing. The Government considers that all necessary measary measures have been taken and the case should be closed. [1] Adoptată de Comitetul de Miniștri la 6 decembrie 2012 în cadrul celei de-a 1157-a reuniuni a delegaților miniștrilor. [2] Numai în limba engleză.

Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)231

[1]

J.M. contre Royaume-Uni

Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme

(Requête n

o

37060/06, arrêt du 28 septembre 2010, définitif le 28 décembre 2010)

Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit qu’il surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «

la Convention

» et «

la Cour

»),

Vu l’arrêt définitif, qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité dans l’affaire ci-dessus et la violation constatée (voir document

DH-DD(2012)937E

)

;

Rappelant l’obligation de l’Etat défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe

1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels il est partie et que cette obligation implique, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour, l’adoption par les autorités de l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire

:

-

de mesures individuelles pour mettre fin aux violations constatées et en effacer les conséquences, dans la mesure du possible par

restitutio in integrum

; et

-

de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ;

Ayant invité le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur à informer le Comité des mesures prises pour se conformer aux obligations susmentionnées

;

Ayant examiné le bilan d’action fourni par le Gouvernement indiquant les mesures adoptées afin d’exécuter l’arrêt y compris les informations fournies en ce qui concerne le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour (voir document

DH-DD(2012)937E

)

;

S’étant assuré que toutes les mesures requises par l’article 46, paragraphe 1, ont été adoptées

;

DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et

DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.

Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights

Action Report

[2]

JM v The United Kingdom (application no

.

37060/06; judgment final on 28/12/2010)

Information submitted by the United Kingdom Government on 10 October 2011

Case Summary

Case description

The case involved an absent mother who was in a same sex relationship. As the non resident parent she was required to contribute towards her children’s upbringing and in 2001 the relevant legislation provided for a reduced amount when the absent parent was in a relationship, but took no account of same sex relationships.

The European Court of Human Rights held that there had been a violation of Article 14 ECHR in conjunction with Article 1 Protocol 1 ECHR.

Individual Measures

Just satisfaction

:

The just satisfaction award has been paid; evidence attached.

General Measures

General measures

The Government considers no further general measures are necessary because the discrimination complaint in this case has already been resolved by means of legislation – the Civil Partnership Act 2004 and subordinate legislation. This amended the relevant legislation to provide that, in the relevant situation, same sex relationships are taken into account in an equivalent way to relationships between persons of the opposite sex.

Publication:

The judgment has been published in:

All England Law Reports: [2010] All ER (D) 51 (Oct)

http://lexisweb.co.uk/cases/2010/September/JM-v-United-Kingdom

British and Irish Legal Information Institute Database: [2010] ECHR 1361

http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/1361.html

Dissemination:

The Government considers it is unnecessary to disseminate the judgment because the law has already been changed (in fact, some considerable time ago – Civil Partnerships Act 2004 and subordinate legislation) and so highlighting the previous legislation would be unnecessary and confusing.

The Government considers that all necessary measures have been taken and the case should be closed.

[1]

Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 6 décembre 2012 lors de la 1157e réunion des Délégués des Ministres.

[2]

En anglais uniquement.