AFFAIRE ŽÁKOVÁ MALINOVÁ CONTRE LA SLOVAQUIE

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2012)220 [1] Zakova Malinova împotriva Republicii Slovace Executarea Deciziei Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (Cercetarea nr. 51493/07, Decizia din 8 noiembrie 2011) Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 39 alineatul (4) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede monitorizarea de către Comitet a executării termenilor regulamentelor amiabile, astfel cum figurează în deciziile Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumită în continuare "Convenția" și "Curtea") întrucât, în această cauză, Curtea, care a luat act de un regulament amiabil la care au ajuns guvernul statului pârât și pârâtul, și având în vedere că regulamentul se baza pe respectarea drepturilor omului, astfel cum este definit în convenție sau în protocoalele sale, a decis să șteargă cauza din rol; (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012) 460E) ; DEClARARE que ui și-a îndeplinit funcțiile în temeiul articolului 39 alineatul (4) din Convenție și DECIDE de la . ACȚIUNE REPORT [2] App. No. 51493/07 Zakova Malinova v. Slovakia, Decision of 18/11/2011, final on 18/11/2011 Case summary Această rubrică se referă la aplicants the complaints on the discontinuation of the investigation into the incident of 25 August 2006 (art. 3 of the Convention) and lack of efectiv remedy in that respect (art. 13 din Convenție). On 25 August 2006, două persoane fizice, noticing that the applicant was speaking Hungarian on the phone, attacked her shuting The applicante further applications and requests for instituting investigation were also rejected or rejected unanswered. The partis reached a friendly settlement where the Government undertook to expres their regret for the case of the aplicant in the form of press release. I. Measures realized In the friendly settlement agreement the Government admitted that there were some circumstations in the case of the applicant that invoked doubts as to the respect of the applications rights guaranteed in the European Convention and they undertook to expres their regret for the case of the aplicant in the form of press release. The applicant declarad that she ha no financial requirement against the Slovak Republic and wa1ved any further claims against the Slovak Republic in respect of thefacts of the application no 51493/07. Accordingly, no sum to the applicant has been paid. on 1 February 2012 the Government of the Slovak Republic publicished on their official website the following press release. The Government of the Slovak Republic admit that there are some circumstations in the case no. 51493/07 of the applicant Hedviga iakova Malmova, lodged to the European Court of Human Rights, that invoke doubts as to the respect of the applicant Therefore, the Government of the Slovak Republic acceptăd the friendly settlement in the case which the European Court of Human Rights took note of on 8 November 2011 and decided to strike tile application out of its fist of cases. In the same time, the Government of the Slovak Republic express their regret for the case of the aplicant Hedviga iakova Malinova. In the application no. 51493107 lodged to the European Court of Human Rights. II. Concluzie of the respondent state the Government consider that the Slovak Republic has thus compliment with its obligations under Article 46§1 of the Convention in Bratislava 22 March 2012 Marica Pirojkova Agent of the Slovak Republic before the European Court of Human Rights [1] Adoptată de Comitetul de Miniștri la 6 decembrie 2012 în cadrul celei de-a 1157-a reuniuni a delegaților miniștrilor. [2] Numai în limba engleză.

Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)220

[1]

Zakova Malinova contre République slovaque

Exécution de la décision de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme

(Requête n

o

51493/07, décision du 8 novembre 2011)

Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 39, paragraphe 4, de la Convention pour la sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit que le Comité surveille l’exécution des termes des règlements amiables tels qu’ils figurent dans les décisions de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après «

la Convention

» et «

la Cour

»)

;

Considérant que dans cette affaires la Cour, ayant pris acte d’un règlement amiable auquel avaient abouti le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur et la partie requérante, et s’étant assurée que le règlement était basé sur le respect des droits de l’homme tel que défini dans la Convention ou ses Protocoles, a décidé de rayer l’affaire du rôle ;

S’étant assuré de l’exécution des termes du règlement amiable par le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur (voir document

DH-DD(2012)460E

) ;

DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 39, paragraphe 4, de la Convention et

DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.

ACTION REPORT

[2]

App. No. 51493/07

Zakova Malinova v. Slovakia, decision of 18/11/2011, final on 18/11/2011

Case summary

This case concerns the applicant’s complaints on the discontinuation of the investigation into the incident of 25 August 2006 (Article 3 of the Convention) and lack of effective remedy in that respect (Article 13 of the Convention). On 25 August 2006, two individuals, noticing that the applicant was speaking Hungarian on the phone, attacked her shouting «In Slovakia in Slovak» and caused serious injuries to the applicant. On 26 August 2006 an investigation was opened but later it was discontinued with the conclusion that the incident had not taken place. The applicant’s further applications and requests for instituting investigation were also rejected or remained unanswered. The parties reached a friendly settlement where the Government undertook to express their regret for the case of the applicant in the form of press release.

I. Measures realized

In the friendly settlement agreement the Government admitted that there were some circumstances in the case of the applicant that invoked doubts as to the respect of the applicant’s rights guaranteed in the European Convention and they undertook to express their regret for the case of the applicant in the form of press release. The applicant declared that she had no financial requirement against the Slovak Republic and wa1ved any further claims against the Slovak Republic in respect of the facts of the application no 51493/07.

Accordingly, no sum to the applicant has been paid.

On 1 February 2012 the Government of the Slovak Republic published on their official internet site the following press release. The Government of the Slovak Republic admit that there are some circumstances in the case no. 51493/07 of the applicant Hedviga iakova Malmova, lodged to the European Court of Human Rights, that invoke doubts as to the respect of the applicant’s rights guaranteed in the European Convention on Human Rights. Therefore, the Government of the Slovak Republic accepted the friendly settlement in the case which the European Court of Human Rights took note of on 8 November 2011 and decided to strike tile application out of its fist of cases. In the same time, the Government of the Slovak Republic express their regret for the case of the applicant Hedviga iakova Malinova. In the application no. 51493107 lodged to the European Court of Human Rights.

II. Conclusion of the respondent state

The Government consider that the Slovak Republic has thus complied with its obligations under Article 46§1 of the Convention

In Bratislava 22 March 2012

Marica Pirojkova

Agent of the Slovak Republic

before the European Court of Human Rights

[1]

Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 6 décembre 2012 lors de la 1157e réunion des Délégués des Ministres.

[2]

En anglais uniquement.