AFFAIRE BULINWAR OOD ET HRUSANOV CONTRE LA BULGARIE

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2012)150 [1] Bulinwar OD și Hrusanov împotriva Bulgariei Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (Recherche n 66455/01, Hotărârea din 12 aprilie 2007, definitivă la 12 iulie 2007) Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede că el supraveghează executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumite în continuare "menționate mai jos " Convenția" și "Curtea"), Având în vedere hotărârea definitivă, care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului în cauza de mai sus și încălcarea constatată (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012) 914E [2] care reamintește obligația statului pârât, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (3) (1) din Convenție, să se conformeze hotărârilor definitive în litigiile la care este parte și că această obligație implică, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte, adoptarea de către autoritățile din statul membru în cauză, dacă este necesar de măsuri individuale pentru a pune capăt încălcărilor constatate și pentru a elimina consecințele acestora, în măsura posibilului de către Restitutio in integrum ; și măsuri generale de prevenire a unor încălcări similare ; Am invitat guvernul statului pârât să informeze Comitetul cu privire la măsurile luate pentru a se conforma obligațiilor menționate anterior După examinarea bilanțului de acțiune furnizat de guvern care indică măsurile adoptate în vederea executării hotărârii judecătorești, inclusiv informațiile furnizate în ceea ce privește plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012) 914E FIȘĂ fiind asigurat că au fost adoptate toate măsurile prevăzute la art. 46 alineatul (1); DECLAMENTUL PE CARE își îndeplinește funcțiile în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenție în această cauză și DECIDE d Această rubrică se referă la infringement of the applicant company right of access to a scurt to challenge the refuzal by a state commission to authorise the use of its new cladition (violation of Article 6§1). The Supreme Administrative Court has found that it was not competent to examin an administrativ decision on the merits. The European Court did not find a violation in respect of the al doilea aplicant, dle Hrusanov. 1. Individual Measures: An amount of just satisfaction has not been awarded by the Court. The applicant company has availed itself of the legislative framework and has submitted a request in order to initiate the revocation of the judgment violating its right to access to a scurt. Following its request, the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court was quashed on the grounds of art. 239§6 of Code of Administrative Procedure of 2006 and the Judicial procedings were reopened. In the new proceseedings, the Supreme Administrative Court confirmăd the lower pendréd which is infallour of the aplicant company. Therefore, the government considers that the applications company interests are fully protected and that no further individual measures seem necessary. 2. General Measures The government is of the parend that the case under supervision of the Committee of Ministers constitutes an izolated infringement of the right to access to a court in the field of urban development. The judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court criticised by the European Court is not part of a constant jurisprudence in this respect and has been quashed after the reopening of the process. Moreover, the legal framework applicable at the relevant time has been repealed and rememberced by new legislation in the area of urban development. New legislation has also been adopted in the area of administrative procesdure, namely the Code of Administrative Procedure of 2006. A translation has been prepared and the judgment has been publicished on the website of the Ministry of Justice www.justice.government.bg 3. Concluzii Inconclusion the government considers that the measures adopted have remedied the consecvences for the applications of the aplicant of the convention found by the European Court in this case, that these measures will prevent new similarar încălcăris and that Bulgaria have compliment with its obligation under 46 §1 of the convention. [1] Adoptată de Comitetul miniștrilor la 6 decembrie 2012 în cadrul celei de-a 1157-a ședințe a delegaților miniștrilor. [2] Numai în limba engleză

Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)150

[1]

Bulinwar OD et Hrusanov contre Bulgarie

Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme

(Requête n

o

66455/01, arrêt du 12 avril 2007, définitif le 12 juillet 2007)

Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit qu’il surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «

la Convention

» et «

la Cour

»),

Vu l’arrêt définitif, qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité dans l’affaire ci-dessus et la violation constatée (voir document

DH-DD(2012)914E

)

[2]

;

Rappelant l’obligation de l’Etat défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe

1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels il est partie et que cette obligation implique, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour, l’adoption par les autorités de l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire

:

-

de mesures individuelles pour mettre fin aux violations constatées et en effacer les conséquences, dans la mesure du possible par

restitutio in integrum

; et

-

de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ;

Ayant invité le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur à informer le Comité des mesures prises pour se conformer aux obligations susmentionnées

;

Ayant examiné le bilan d’action fourni par le Gouvernement indiquant les mesures adoptées afin d’exécuter l’arrêt y compris les informations fournies en ce qui concerne le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour (voir document

DH-DD(2012)914E

)

;

S’étant assuré que toutes les mesures requises par l’article 46, paragraphe 1, ont été adoptées

;

DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et

DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.

Application Bulinvar OOD and Hrusanov v. Bulgaria (no 66455/01)

Action report on the execution of the judgment of the European Court of human rights

delivered on 12/4/2007

This case concerns the infringement of the applicant company’s right of access to a court to challenge the refusal by a state commission to authorise the use of its new building (violation of Article 6§1). The Supreme Administrative Court has found that it was not competent to examine an administrative decision on the merits. The European Court did not find a violation in respect of the second applicant, Mr. Hrusanov.

An amount of just satisfaction has not been awarded by the Court.

The applicant company has availed itself of the legislative framework and has submitted a request in order to initiate the revocation of the judgment violating its right to access to a court.

Following its request, the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court was quashed on the grounds of art. 239§6 of Code of Administrative Procedure of 2006 and the judicial proceedings were reopened. In the new proceedings, the Supreme Administrative Court confirmed the lower court’s decision which is in favour of the applicant company.

Therefore, the government considers that the applicant’s company interests are fully protected and that no further individual measures seem necessary.

The government is of the opinion that the case under supervision of the Committee of Ministers constitutes an isolated infringement of the right to access to a court in the field of urban development. The judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court criticised by the European Court is not part of a constant jurisprudence in this respect and has been quashed after the reopening of the proceedings.

Moreover, the legal framework applicable at the relevant time has been repealed and replaced by new legislation in the area of urban development. New legislation has also been adopted in the area of administrative procedure, namely the Code of Administrative Procedure of 2006.

A translation has been prepared and the judgment has been published on the web site of the Ministry of justice

www.justice.government.bg

.

In conclusion the government considers that the measures adopted have remedied the consequences for the applicant of the violation of the Convention found by the European Court in this case, that these measures will prevent new similar violations and that Bulgaria have complied with its obligation under 46 §1 of the Convention.

[1]

Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 6 décembre 2012 lors de la 1157e réunion des Délégués des Ministres.

[2]

En anglais uniquement