AFFAIRE DARÓCZY CONTRE LA HONGRIE

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2012)187 [1] Daroczy împotriva Ungariei Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (Recherche n 44378/05, Hotărârea din 01/07/2008, definitivă la 01/10/2008) Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede că el supraveghează executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumite în continuare "menționate mai jos " Convenția" și "Curtea"), Având în vedere hotărârea definitivă, care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului în cauza de mai sus și încălcarea constatată (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012) 872E [2] care reamintește obligația statului pârât, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (3) (1) din Convenție, să se conformeze hotărârilor definitive în litigiile la care este parte și că această obligație implică, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte, adoptarea de către autoritățile din statul membru în cauză, dacă este necesar de măsuri individuale pentru a pune capăt încălcărilor constatate și pentru a elimina consecințele acestora, în măsura posibilului de către Restitutio in integrum ; și măsuri generale de prevenire a unor încălcări similare ; Am invitat guvernul statului pârât să informeze Comitetul cu privire la măsurile luate pentru a se conforma obligațiilor menționate anterior După examinarea bilanțului de acțiune furnizat de guvern care indică măsurile adoptate în vederea executării hotărârii judecătorești, inclusiv informațiile furnizate în ceea ce privește plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012) 872E) ; cu asigurarea faptului că au fost adoptate toate măsurile impuse prin art. 46 alineatul (1) DECLAMENTUL CHIIL și-a îndeplinit atribuțiile în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din convenție în această cauză și DECIDE d . REVIZED Action Report of 15 June 2012 App. No. 44378/05 Daróczy, judgement of 1/07/2008 Introductory case summary The applicant was obligad to change her Married name (from "Tiboré Daróczy" to "Tibor Ipoline Daróczy"), which she had been using sine her maririage in 1950 and for which the state authorities had issued her with several official documents, inclusivding her identity card. She leged on Article 8 (right to respect for privatate and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights. The European Court of Human Rights found that the restriction fored on the aplicant had been unacceptably ricid and completely disgarded her interests, in that she had been forced to alter a name which she had used for more than 50 years and which, beyond its supportance in self-identif and self-determination, also gave her a strong personal link to her late husband. The Court prin urmare held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article I. Individual measures - Just satisfaction rewarded to the aplicants was paid on 4 November 2008 in sum of 1,363,902 HUF. (Doamna Daróczy 3,500 EUR) in respect of moraly damage and EUR 1,800 for costs and expenses.) - The applicant received the official documents about the requested change of her name on 15 June 2009 and is thus now allowed to bear old mariried name again. No further individual measures are necessary in the execution process. II. General Measures Secțiunea 27/B of the Act no. 17 of 1982 on maternal register, căsătorire procesue and names was amended by the Act no. 21 of 2009 (Secțiunea 1 para (3), entered into force on 1 June 2009). This change of legislation made it posibil to file a micion in order to change the name of the aplicant.Acording to the legal provision: The Married name of a person Bearing the name of his or her spouse may be changed upon request to that effect where the courier exists, and by an official certificate urmable for identificare of persons or by a basic document of the registry of citizens maial data and address it can be verified that the ex-spouse's his or her name in the requested form. The decision was translated and the Hungarian version was publicityshed on the website of the Government: http://igazsagugyiinfomaciok.kormany.hu/az-emberi-jogok-europai-birosaganak-iteletei No further general measures were considered necessary, because similar problems can be avoided due to the change in the Act. III. Concluzii of the responcent state The Government consider that the measures adopted have fully remedied the consecvences for the aplicant of the violation of the Convention found by the Court in this case, and that Hungary has compliment with its obligations under Article 46, Paragraph 1 of the Convention. Budapest, 14 June 2012 Zoltán Tallódi Co-Agent of the Government of Hungary [1] Adoptată de Comitetul miniștrilor la 6 decembrie 2012 în cadrul celei de-a 1157-a ședințe a delegaților miniștrilor. [2] Numai în limba engleză

Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)187

[1]

Daroczy contre Hongrie

Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme

(Requête n

o

44378/05, arrêt du 01/07/2008, définitif le 01/10/2008)

Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit qu’il surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «

la Convention

» et «

la Cour

»),

Vu l’arrêt définitif, qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité dans l’affaire ci-dessus et la violation constatée (voir document

DH-DD(2012)872E

)

[2]

;

Rappelant l’obligation de l’Etat défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe

1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels il est partie et que cette obligation implique, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour, l’adoption par les autorités de l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire

:

-

de mesures individuelles pour mettre fin aux violations constatées et en effacer les conséquences, dans la mesure du possible par

restitutio in integrum

; et

-

de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ;

Ayant invité le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur à informer le Comité des mesures prises pour se conformer aux obligations susmentionnées

;

Ayant examiné le bilan d’action fourni par le gouvernement indiquant les mesures adoptées afin d’exécuter l’arrêt y compris les informations fournies en ce qui concerne le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour (voir document

DH-DD(2012)872E

) ;

S’étant assuré que toutes les mesures requises par l’article 46, paragraphe 1, ont été adoptées

;

DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et

DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.

Revised Action Report of 15 June 2012

Appl. No. 44378/05

Daróczy, judgement of 1/07/2008

Introductory case summary

The applicant was obliged to change her married name (from "Tiborné Daróczy" to "Tibor Ipolyné Daróczy"), which she had been using since her marriage in 1950 and for which the state authorities had issued her with several offcial documents, including her identity card. She relied on Article

8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights. The European Court of Human Rights found that the restriction imposed on the applicant had been unacceptably rigid and completely disregarded her interests, in that she had been forced to alter a name which she had used for more than 50 years and which, beyond its relevance in self-identification and self-determination, also gave her a strong personal link to her late husband. The Court therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article

8.

I. Individual measures

- Just satisfaction rewarded to the applicants was paid on 4 November 2008 in sum of 1,363,902 HUF. (Ms

Daróczy 3,500

euros

(EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and EUR

1,800 for costs and expenses.)

- The applicant received the official documents about the requested change of her name on 15 June 2009 and is thus now allowed to bear her old married name again.

No further individual measures are necessary in the execution process.

II. General measures

Section 27/B of the Act no. 17 of 1982 on maternal register, marriage procedure and names was amended by the Act no. 21 of 2009 (Section 1 para (3), entered into force on 1 June 2009). This change of legislation made it possible to file a petition in order to change the name of the applicant. According to the legal provision:

„The married name of a person bearing the name of his or her spouse may be changed upon request to that effect where

a)

the marriage no longer exists, and

b)

by an official certificate suitable for identification of persons or by a basic document of the registry of citizens’ personal data and addresses it can be verified that the ex-spouse bore his or her name in the requested form.”

The decision was translated and the Hungarian version was published on the website of the Government: (

http://igazsagugyiinformaciok.kormany.hu/az-emberi-jogok-europai-birosaganak-iteletei

).

No further general measures were considered necessary, because similar problems can be avoided due to the change in the Act.

III. Conclusions of the respondent state

The Government consider that the measures adopted have fully remedied the consequences for the applicant of the violation of the Convention found by the Court in this case, and that Hungary has thus complied with its obligations under Article 46, Paragraph 1 of the Convention.

Budapest, 14 June 2012

Zoltán Tallódi

Co-Agent of the Government of Hungary

[1]

Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 6 décembre 2012 lors de la 1157e réunion des Délégués des Ministres.

[2]

En anglais uniquement