Takush împotriva Greciei

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2013) 177 Takush împotriva Greciei Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (Recuperarea nr. 2853/09, Hotărârea din 17/012012, definitivă la 17/04/2012) (adoptată de Comitetul de Miniștri la 18 septembrie 2013, cu ocazia celei de-a 1178-a ședințe a delegaților miniștrilor) Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede ca Comitetul să supravegheze executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumite în continuare "convenția" și "Curtea"), Având în vedere hotărârea definitivă care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului în cauza de mai sus și încălcările constatate reamintind obligația statului pârât, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (1) (1) din Convenție, să se conformeze hotărârilor definitive în litigiile la care este parte și că această obligație implică, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte, adoptarea de către autoritățile din statul membru în cauză, dacă este necesar de măsuri individuale pentru a pune capăt încălcărilor constatate și pentru a elimina consecințele acestora, în măsura posibilului de către Restitutio in integrum de măsuri generale de prevenire a unor încălcări similare ;

Am invitat guvernul statului pârât să informeze Comitetul cu privire la măsurile luate pentru a se conforma obligației După examinarea bilanțului de acțiune furnizat de guvern care indică măsurile adoptate în vederea executării hotărârii judecătorești, inclusiv informațiile furnizate în ceea ce privește plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2013) 480 S Punând la dispoziție toate măsurile necesare în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (1), DECLAMENTUL PE CARE își îndeplinește funcțiile în temeiul art. 46 alin. (2) din Convenție în această cauză și DECIDE d'en . Acțiune report Fatmir Takush v. Greece (numai în limba engleză) Introducere The Court found that the appicants deportation was in breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 on the folowing grounds: 1) The applicant, who was lawfully residence on Greek territory at the time of the transportation, was deported urgently for reasons of public order, which is a case authorised by paragraph 2 of Article 1. Nevertheless the competent authorities failed to prove that the aplicant was periculoaseous for public order and security.

2) Beuse of the above urgent deportation the applicant was deprived of his right to have his case examined before deportation as he was entitled acording to Article 1 paragraph 1 of Protocol No. Individual measures Just satisfaction The just satisfaction award has been paid. No further individual measures are required, due to the fact that the deportation decision has been quashed by virtute of No. 2995/2011 judgment of the Administrator Court of Salonicki. By virtute of the same judgment the appicant The judgment of the Court has been translated into Greek and the translation has been publicished on the website of the State Legal Council (www.nsk.gov.gr). By separate letter, the Government Agents Office transmitted the judgment to the Ministry resided and to the police, explaining the findings of the judgment and advising on the measures that should be adopted for its implementation.

Following the above advice, the Police Headquarters took action by way of Circular dated 15 November 2012 and addressed to all authorities involved in the deportation procedure (atașamentul I). In said Circular, the findings of the judgment are elaborated and the agents of the content authorities are requested to comply with them. State of execution of the judgment In the judgment, it is noted (§61) that although the Greek legal system provides foreigers with a number of remedies a transportation order, the way that the deportation of the aplicant was executed deprived him of his rights to challenge efectivly the deportation order. Therefore, the breach found by the Court privibles the implementation of the legislation in the adjudicated case.

The government considers that the case is limitated to its own particularfacts and no further general measures are required. Dimitrios Kalogiros Adviser at the State Legal Council

Résolution CM/ResDH(2013)177 Takush contre Grèce Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (Requête n o 2853/09, arrêt du 17/01/2012, définitif le 17/04/2012) (adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 18 septembre 2013, lors de la 1178e réunion des Délégués des Ministres) Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit que le Comité surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées « la Convention » et « la Cour »), Vu l’arrêt définitif qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité dans l’affaire ci-dessus et les violations constatées ; Rappelant l’obligation de l’Etat défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels il est partie et que cette obligation implique, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour, l’adoption par les autorités de l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire : - de mesures individuelles pour mettre fin aux violations constatées et en effacer les conséquences, dans la mesure du possible par restitutio in integrum ; et - de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ;

Ayant invité le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur à informer le Comité des mesures prises pour se conformer à l’obligation susmentionnée ; Ayant examiné le bilan d’action fourni par le gouvernement indiquant les mesures adoptées afin d’exécuter l’arrêt, y compris les informations fournies en ce qui concerne le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour (voir document DH-DD(2013)480 ) ; S’étant assuré que toutes les mesures requises par l’article 46, paragraphe 1, ont été adoptées, DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.

Action report Fatmir Takush v. Greece (Application No. 2853/09) (anglais uniquement) Introduction The Court found that the applicant’s deportation was in breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 on the following grounds: 1) The applicant, who was lawfully resident on Greek territory at the time of the deportation, was deported urgently for reasons of public order, which is a case authorised by paragraph 2 of Article 1. Nevertheless the competent authorities failed to prove that the applicant was dangerous for public order and security. 2) Because of the above urgent deportation the applicant was deprived of his right to have his case examined before deportation as he was entitled according to Article 1 paragraph 1 of Protocol No. 7. Individual measures Just satisfaction The just satisfaction award has been paid.

No further individual measures are required, due to the fact that the deportation decision has been quashed by virtue of No. 2995/2011 judgment of the Administrative Court of Thessaloniki. By virtue of the same judgment the applicant’s name was removed from the list of undesirable foreigners (EKANA). General measures Publication The judgment of the Court has been translated into Greek and the translation has been published on the website of the State Legal Council (www.nsk.gov.gr). Dissemination By separate letter, the Government Agent’s Office transmitted the judgment to the Ministry concerned and to the police, explaining the findings of the judgment and advising on the measures that should be adopted for its implementation.

Following the above advice, the Police Headquarters took action by way of a Circular dated 15 November 2012 and addressed to all authorities involved in the deportation procedure (attachment I). In said Circular, the findings of the judgment are elaborated and the agents of the competent authorities are requested to comply with them. State of execution of the judgment In the judgment, it is noted (§61) that although the Greek legal system provides foreigners with a number of remedies against a deportation order, the way that the deportation of the applicant was executed deprived him of his rights to challenge effectively the deportation order. Therefore, the breach found by the Court concerns the implementation of the relevant legislation in the adjudicated case.

The government considers that the case is confined to its own specific facts and no further general measures are required. Dimitrios Kalogiros Adviser at the State Legal Council