Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2013)254 Özbek împotriva Turciei Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului Cerere n Cauza Hotărârea Determinativului 25327/04 ÖZBEK 27/05/2010 27/08/2010 (adoptată de Comitetul de Miniștri la 5 decembrie 2013, cu ocazia celei de-a 1186-a ședințe a delegaților miniștrilor) Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede ca Comitetul să supravegheze executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumite în continuare "convenția" și "Curtea"), Având în vedere hotărârea definitivă transmisă de Curte Comitetului în această cauză și încălcarea constatată reamintind obligația statului pârât, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (1) (1) din Convenție, să se conformeze hotărârilor definitive în litigiile la care este parte și că această obligație implică, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte, adoptarea de către autoritățile din statul membru în cauză, dacă este necesar de măsuri individuale pentru a pune capăt încălcărilor constatate și pentru a elimina consecințele acestora, în măsura posibilului de către Restitutio in integrum de măsuri generale de prevenire a unor încălcări similare care au invitat guvernul din statul pârât să informeze Comitetul cu privire la măsurile luate pentru a se conforma obligației respective După ce a examinat bilanțul de acțiune furnizat de guvern indicând măsurile adoptate pentru a executa hotărârea și notând că nu s-a acordat nicio satisfacție echitabilă în prezenta cauză (a se vedea documentul (DH-DD(2013) 431 [1] S DECLAMENTUL pe care l-a îndeplinit în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenție în această cauză și DECIDE d The aplicant Nuri Özbek had initiated compensation proceedings for the unlawful ocupation of his land. He complained that he had been deprived of his right to property due to the dismissal of these procesings. CONTENT OF THE JUDGMENT Cu its judgment dated 27 May 2010, the European Court of Human Rights ("the Court"), found the applicant The Court did not award the aplicant any compensation sinence the aplicant had not made a claim for it. INDIVIDUAL MEASures 1 - Damages and Court expenses Re-opening of a hearing is regulated by Article 375 in the Code of Civil Procedure. According to this regulation, the applicant should application for the reopening of the trial within 3 months after the arrivel of legal notition of the ECt's judgement. The applicant had not applicated for the renewal of the trial though he had the oportunity to do so. It should also be emphasised that the re-opening of Judicial proceedings can only be initiated with a claim made to that effect by the applicant himself. 2 - Removal of the Fences and Returning of the Land to the Applicant The fences that surrounded the applicicants land have been removed and the land in interogare was exclusded from the military zone. The aplicant was informad of this situation with the letter of the 3 The Özbek judgment was translated into Turkish and publicished on the official website of Human Rights Department of the Ministry of Justice. This judgment is available at http://www.inhak.adalet.gov.tr/ara/karar/ozbek.pdf În plus, textul "Traduction of the Judgment was simte primarily to the curted that rendred the judgment and to the support authorities such as the Human Rights Inquiry Committee of the Turkish Grand National Assembly, the Human Rights Department of the Prime Ministry, the Constitutional Court, the Court of Cassation, the Ministry of Interior, and the Ministry of Finance. 2 - Individual application before the Constitutional Court Individual application was introduced into the Turkish legal system by the 2010 constitutional amendments, and Since 23 September 2012, the Constitutional Court has been receiving applications. art. 148 din Constituție prevede că anyonee who thinks that his/her constitutional rights set forth in the European Convention on Human Rights have been infringed by a public authority will have a right to appy to the Constitutional Court after exhausting other domestic remedies. După examinarea Constitutional Court decides whether the fundamental rights of the applicant have been violated or not. If it finds incalcation, it may also decide what should be done in order to redress the violer and its consecintes. In case the încălcarea has been cauzăd by a court decision, the Constitutional Court sends the file to the content scurt for retrial in order to restore the fundamental rights of the aplicant. Dar, dacă Constitutional Court deems that there will be no use of a re-trial, then it may award compensation to the aplicant or it may ask the aplicant to file a case before the competent first-instance scurt to seek compensation for the damages s/he suffered. 3 - Training and Awareness Raising Activeities On 21-22 May 2012 și 24-25 May 2012, High Council of Judges and Prosecutors and Justice Academy of Turkey organizează un trening sesions under "In-Service Training on Exproprietion Cases" in Ankara for the judge who hear exproprietion cases. The participants were provided with trening on "Trial Procedure in Exproprietion Law, Confiscating without Expropriating and Evaluation of the ECTHR Judgments." This trening session rised the awareness of participants on the evolving case-law of the ECTHR who were the judges who hear exproprietion cases. EXECUtion OF THE JUDGMENT The Government firstly underlines thefact that the case is of an izolated natura and the case does not stem from a systemic problem. Secondly, the Government maints that Turkey has taken all the necessary general measures and that no further individual measure is needed for the execution of the Nuri Özbek judgment. The Government prin urmare respectfully invitates the Committee of Ministers to close the examination of the case. [1] Numai engleză.
Résolution CM/ResDH(2013)254
Özbek contre Turquie
Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme
Requête n
o
Affaire
Arrêt du
Définitif le
25327/04
ÖZBEK
27/05/2010
27/08/2010
(adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 5 décembre 2013,
lors de la 1186e réunion des Délégués des Ministres)
Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit que le Comité surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «
la Convention
» et «
la Cour
»),
Vu l’arrêt définitif transmis par la Cour au Comité dans cette affaire et la violation constatée
;
Rappelant l’obligation de l’Etat défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe
1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels il est partie et que cette obligation implique, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour, l’adoption par les autorités de l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire
:
-
de mesures individuelles pour mettre fin aux violations constatées et en effacer les conséquences, dans la mesure du possible par
restitutio in integrum
;
et
-
de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables
;
Ayant invité le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur à informer le Comité des mesures prises pour se conformer à l’obligation susmentionnée
;
Ayant examiné le bilan d’action fourni par le gouvernement indiquant les mesures adoptées afin d’exécuter l’arrêt, et notant qu’aucune satisfaction équitable n’a été octroyée par la Cour dans la présente affaire (voir document (
[1]
)
;
S’étant assuré que toutes les mesures requises par l’article 46, paragraphe 1, ont été adoptées,
DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et
DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.
Execution of European Court of Human Rights
Judgment in the case of Özbek v. Turkey (25327/04) dated 27 May 2010
(anglais uniquement)
A.
FACTS
The applicant Nuri Özbek had initiated compensation proceedings for the unlawful occupation of his land. He complained that he had been deprived of his right to property due to the dismissal of these proceedings.
B.
With its judgment dated 27 May 2010, the European Court of Human Rights ("the Court") found the applicant’s complaint reasonable. The Court stated that the unlawful occupation of the applicant’s land by the Military Forces and not being paid any compensation for it was in violation of the right to property.
The Court did not award the applicant any compensation since the applicant had not made a claim for it.
C.
1 - Damages and Court expenses
Re-opening of a hearing is regulated by Article 375 in the Code of Civil Procedure. According to this regulation, the applicant should apply for the reopening of the trial within 3 months after the arrival of legal notification of the ECtHR’s judgement. The applicant had not applied for the renewal of the trial even though he had the opportunity to do so. It should also be emphasised that the re-opening of judicial proceedings can only be initiated with a claim made to that effect by the applicant himself.
2 - Removal of the Fences and Returning of the Land to the Applicant
The fences that surrounded the applicant’s land have been removed and the land in question was excluded from the military zone. The applicant was informed of this situation with the letter of the 3’d Corps Commandership dated 17 January 2002.
D.
1 - Translation and publication of the judgment
The Özbek judgment was translated into Turkish and published on the official website of Human Rights Department of the Ministry of Justice. This judgment is available at
http://www.inhak.adalet.gov.tr/ara/karar/ozbek.pdf
.
In addition, the translation of the judgment was sent primarily to the court that rendered the judgment and to the relevant authorities such as the Human Rights Inquiry Committee of the Turkish Grand National Assembly, the Human Rights Department of the Prime Ministry, the Constitutional Court, the Court of Cassation, the Ministry of Interior, and the Ministry of Finance.
2 - Individual application before the Constitutional Court
Individual application was introduced into the Turkish legal system by the 2010 constitutional amendments, and since 23 September 2012, the Constitutional Court has been receiving applications. Article 148 of the Constitution stipulates that anyone who thinks that his/her constitutional rights set forth in the European Convention on Human Rights have been infringed by a public authority will have a right to apply to the Constitutional Court after exhausting other domestic remedies.
After examination, the Constitutional Court decides whether the fundamental rights of the applicant have been violated or not. If it finds violation, it may also decide what should be done in order to redress the violation and its consequences.
In case the violation has been caused by a court decision, the Constitutional Court sends the file to the competent court for retrial in order to restore the fundamental rights of the applicant. But, if the Constitutional Court deems that there will be no use of a re-trial, then it may award compensation to the applicant or it may ask the applicant to file a case before the competent first-instance court to seek compensation for the damages s/he suffered.
3 - Training and Awareness Raising Activities
On 21-22 May 2012 and 24-25 May 2012, the High Council of Judges and Prosecutors and Justice Academy of Turkey organised a training sessions under "In-Service Training on Expropriation Cases" in Ankara for the judges who hear expropriation cases. The participants were provided with training on "Trial Procedure in Expropriation Law, Confiscating without Expropriating and Evaluation of the ECtHR Judgments". This training session raised the awareness of participants on the evolving case-law of the ECtHR who were the judges who hear expropriation cases.
E.
The Government firstly underlines the fact that the case is of an isolated nature and the case does not stem from a systemic problem. Secondly, the Government maintains that Turkey has taken all the necessary general measures and that no further individual measure is needed for the execution of the Nuri Özbek judgment. The Government therefore respectfully invites the Committee of Ministers to close the examination of the case.
[1]
Anglais uniquement.