CtEDO 12.05.2015 AI

CASE OF IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania

RESPONDENT
GEO
HOTĂRÂRE
12.05.2015
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 14+3 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Prohibition of torture;Effective investigation;Positive obligations);Violation of Article 14+11 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association;Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2015
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania (CtEDO, 2015)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate; Încălcarea articolului 14+3 - Interzicerea discriminării (Articolul 14 - Discriminare) (Articolul 3 - Tratament degradant; Tratament inuman; Interzicerea torturii; Investigație eficace; Obligații pozitive); Încălcarea articolului 14+11 - Interzicerea discriminării (Articolul 14 - Discriminare) (Articolul 11 - Libertatea de întrunire și asociere; Articolul 11-1 - Libertatea de întrunire pașnică); Prejudiciu moral - despăgubire (Articolul 41 - Prejudiciu moral; Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2015-05-12
0,98
CASE OF IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 14+3 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Prohibition of torture;Effective investigation;Positive obligations);Violation
CtEDO 2015-05-12
0,97
Identoba and Others v. Georgia
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 14+3 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Prohibition of torture;Effective investigation;Positive obligations);Violation
CtEDO 2021-06-01
0,95
CASE OF ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discriminatio
CtEDO 2016-01-12
0,95
CASE OF BOACĂ AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigat
CtEDO 2021-06-01
0,94
Association ACCEPT and Others v. Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discriminatio
Sursă