CtEDO 10.10.2019 AI

CASE OF BATIASHVILI v. GEORGIA - [Romanian Translation] by Teodor Papuc

RESPONDENT
GEO
HOTĂRÂRE
10.10.2019
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-2 - Presumption of innocence);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF BATIASHVILI v. GEORGIA - [Romanian Translation] by Teodor Papuc (CtEDO, 2019)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate; (Art. 35-1) Epuizarea cailor de atac interne; (Art. 35-3-a) Manifestă lipsă de fundament; Nicio încălcare a Articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-3 - Caracterul rezonabil al detenției preventive); Nicio încălcare a Articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-4 - Garanții proceduale de control); Încălcare a Articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6-2 - Prezumția de nevinovăție); Prejudiciu moral - acordare (Articolul 41 - Prejudiciu moral; Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2019-10-10
0,99
CASE OF BATIASHVILI v. GEORGIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial de
CtEDO 2019-10-10
0,98
Batiashvili v. Georgia
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial de
CtEDO 2024-12-05
0,95
CASE OF KEZERASHVILI v. GEORGIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartia
CtEDO 2024-05-23
0,95
CASE OF SAAKASHVILI v. GEORGIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);No viola
CtEDO 2017-11-28
0,95
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the European Institute of Romania
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-4) Rejection of application at any stage of the proceedings;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criter
Sursă