CtEDO 07.02.2017 AI

CASE OF LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
07.02.2017
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 13+11 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association;Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 11+10 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression;Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{General});Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Fair hearing);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2017)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil; Încălcarea Articolului 13+11 - Dreptul la un recurs efectiv (Articolul 13 - Recurs efectiv) (Articolul 11 - Libertatea de întrunire și asociere; Articolul 11-1 - Libertatea de întrunire pașnică); Încălcarea Articolului 11+10 - Libertatea de întrunire și asociere (Articolul 11-1 - Libertatea de întrunire pașnică) (Articolul 10-1 - Libertatea de expresie; Articolul 10 - Libertatea de expresie-{General}); Încălcarea Articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-1 - Arestare sau detenție legală); Încălcarea Articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri civile; Articolul 6-1 - Accesul la instanță; Judecată echitabilă); Daune materiale - acordare (Articolul 41 - Daune materiale; Satisfacție echitabilă); Daune morale - acordare (Articolul 41 - Daune morale; Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-11-27
0,96
CASE OF ALEKSEYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 13+11 - Right to an effect
CtEDO 2016-01-05
0,95
CASE OF FRUMKIN v. RUSSIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);V
CtEDO 2018-07-17
0,95
CASE OF MARIYA ALEKHINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspec
CtEDO 2019-05-07
0,95
CASE OF MITYANIN AND LEONOV v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article
CtEDO 2016-01-05
0,94
Frumkin v. Russia
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);V
Sursă