CtEDO 23.02.2017 AI

CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the European Institute of Romania

RESPONDENT
ITA
HOTĂRÂRE
23.02.2017
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Civil rights and obligations;Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Civil rights and obligations;Fair hearing);No violation of Article 13+P4-2-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement;Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general});Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the European Institute of Romania (CtEDO, 2017)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate; Încălcarea Articolului 2 din Protocolul nr. 4 - Libertatea de circulație-{general} (Articolul 2 alin. 1 din Protocolul nr. 4 - Libertatea de circulație); Încălcarea Articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri civile; Articolul 6 alin. 1 - Drepturi și obligații civile; Audiență echitabilă); Nicio încălcare a Articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri civile; Articolul 6 alin. 1 - Drepturi și obligații civile; Audiență echitabilă); Nicio încălcare a Articolului 13+P4-2-1 - Dreptul la un recurs efectiv (Articolul 13 - Recurs efectiv) (Articolul 2 alin. 1 din Protocolul nr. 4 - Libertatea de circulație; Articolul 2 din Protocolul nr. 4 - Libertatea de circulație-{general}); Prejudiciu patrimonial - cerere respinsă (Articolul 41 - Prejudiciu patrimonial; Satisfacție echitabilă); Prejudiciu moral - acordare (Articolul 41 - Prejudiciu moral; Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-02-23
0,99
CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY - [Romanian translation] legal summary by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Articl
CtEDO 2017-02-23
0,99
CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Articl
CtEDO 2017-02-23
0,98
CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Articl
CtEDO 2017-02-23
0,97
De Tommaso v. Italy [GC]
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Articl
CtEDO 2018-06-28
0,93
CASE OF G.I.E.M. S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Artic
Sursă