CtEDO 23.02.2017 AI

CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY - [Romanian translation] legal summary by the SCM Romania and IER

RESPONDENT
ITA
HOTĂRÂRE
23.02.2017
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Civil rights and obligations;Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Civil rights and obligations;Fair hearing);No violation of Article 13+P4-2-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement;Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general});Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY - [Romanian translation] legal summary by the SCM Romania and IER (CtEDO, 2017)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil; Violarea articolului 2 al Protocolului nr. 4 - Libertatea de circulație - {general} (Articolul 2 alineatul 1 al Protocolului nr. 4 - Libertatea de circulație); Violarea articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Litigii civile; Articolul 6 alineatul 1 - Drepturi și obligații civile; Audiență echitabilă); Nicio violmare a articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Litigii civile; Articolul 6 alineatul 1 - Drepturi și obligații civile; Audiență echitabilă); Nicio violmare a articolului 13 + P4-2-1 - Dreptul la o cale de atac efectivă (Articolul 13 - Cale de atac efectivă) (Articolul 2 alineatul 1 al Protocolului nr. 4 - Libertatea de circulație; Articolul 2 al Protocolului nr. 4 - Libertatea de circulație - {general}); Prejudiciu patrimonial - pretenție respinsă (Articolul 41 - Prejudiciu patrimonial; Satisfacție echitabilă); Prejudiciu moral - acordare (Articolul 41 - Prejudiciu moral; Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-02-23
0,99
CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Art
CtEDO 2017-02-23
0,99
CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Articl
CtEDO 2017-02-23
0,99
CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Articl
CtEDO 2017-02-23
0,98
De Tommaso v. Italy [GC]
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Articl
CtEDO 2004-04-22
0,92
CASE OF NERONI v. ITALY
Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for cor
Sursă