CtEDO 23.01.2025 Auto

CASE OF REZNIK v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine

RESPONDENT
UKR
HOTĂRÂRE
23.01.2025
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for home;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for home;Respect for private life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF REZNIK v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine (CtEDO, 2025)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de a respecta viața privată și viața de familie (art. 8-1 - Respectul de corespondență;Respectul de domiciliu;Respectul de viață privată);Încălcarea articoluluiui 13+8 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediare eficace) (art. 8-1 - Respectul de corespondență;Respectul de domiciliu;Respectarea de viață privată;art. 8 - Dreptul de a respecta viața privată și viața de familie); prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2025-01-23
1,00
CASE OF REZNIK v. UKRAINE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for home;Respect for privat
CtEDO 2025-01-23
0,99
CASE OF REZNIK v. UKRAINE - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for home;Respect for privat
CtEDO 2023-01-12
0,96
CASE OF OVCHARENKO AND KOLOS v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a
CtEDO 2023-01-12
0,96
CASE OF OVCHARENKO AND KOLOS v. UKRAINE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a
CtEDO 2023-01-12
0,96
Ovcharenko and Kolos v. Ukraine
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a
Sursă