CtEDO 20.03.2018 Auto

Șahin Alpay v. Turkey

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
20.03.2018
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention;Speediness of review);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
Șahin Alpay v. Turkey (CtEDO, 2018)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecția preliminară aderată la fonduri și respinsă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs; menţinerea inadmisibilă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Pronunțat nefondat;Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-1 - Arestarea legală sau deținerea;Procedură prescrisă de lege;art. 5-1-c - Suspiciune rezonabilă);Nici o încălcare a articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-4 - Revizuirea legalității deținerii;Eficientitatea de reexaminare);Violație a articolului 10 - Libertatea de expresie - {generală} (art. 10-1 - Libertatea de expresie); Statul pârât să ia măsuri individuale (art. 46-2 - Măsuri individuale); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-03-20
0,99
CASE OF ȘAHİN ALPAY v. TURKEY
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Arti
CtEDO 2018-03-20
0,97
CASE OF MEHMET HASAN ALTAN v. TURKEY
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Arti
CtEDO 2018-03-20
0,97
Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Arti
CtEDO 2018-03-20
0,97
CASE OF ȘAHİN ALPAY v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Arti
CtEDO 2021-01-19
0,96
CASE OF ATILLA TAȘ v. TURKEY
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to libe
Sursă