CtEDO 12.04.2018 Auto

Chim and Przywieczerski v. Poland

RESPONDENT
POL
HOTĂRÂRE
12.04.2018
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Chim and Przywieczerski v. Poland (CtEDO, 2018)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Rationne personae;Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedură penală;art. 6-1 - Tribunalul instituit prin lege);Nici o încălcare a articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedură penală;art. 6-1 - Tribunalul Imparcial; tribunalul independent);Nici o încălcare a articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedură penală);art. 6-1 - Audiere echitabilă); Prejudiciu material - respinsă (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Dar satisfacție); Prejudiciu moral - constatarea încălării suficiente (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Darticolul)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-04-12
0,99
CASE OF CHIM AND PRZYWIECZERSKI v. POLAND
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);No violation of Article 6 - R
CtEDO 2018-04-12
0,98
CASE OF CHIM AND PRZYWIECZERSKI v. POLAND - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);No violation of Article 6 - R
CtEDO 2022-07-21
0,96
CASE OF BIELIŃSKI v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 13+6 - Right to a
CtEDO 2022-07-21
0,96
CASE OF BIELIŃSKI v. POLAND
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 13+6 - Right to a
CtEDO 2018-10-02
0,95
Mutu and Pechstein v. Switzerland
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Disciplinary proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tr
Sursă