CtEDO 06.11.2018 AI

CASE OF RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E SÁ v. PORTUGAL - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
PRT
HOTĂRÂRE
06.11.2018
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Disciplinary proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Disciplinary proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Public hearing);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E SÁ v. PORTUGAL - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2018)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară respinsă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate; (Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor de atac interne; Rest inadmisibil (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate; (Art. 35-1) Perioada de șase luni; Rest inadmisibil (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae; Nicio încălcare a articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri administrative; Proceduri disciplinare; Articolul 6-1 - Tribunal imparțial; Tribunal independent); Încălcare a articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri administrative; Proceduri disciplinare; Articolul 6-1 - Audiere echitabilă; Audiere publică); Prejudiciu patrimonial - cerere respinsă (Articolul 41 - Prejudiciu patrimonial; Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-11-06
0,99
CASE OF RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E SÁ v. PORTUGAL - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month);Remainder inadmissible (Art
CtEDO 2018-11-06
0,98
CASE OF RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E SÁ v. PORTUGAL
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility
CtEDO 2018-11-06
0,97
Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal [GC]
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility
CtEDO 2017-12-19
0,94
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);
CtEDO 2018-11-06
0,94
AFFAIRE RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E SÁ c. PORTUGAL
Exception préliminaire rejetée (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-1) Épuisement des voies de recours internes;Partiellement irrecevable (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-1) Délai de six mois;Partiellement irrecevable
Sursă