CtEDO 18.12.2018 AI

CASE OF MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
18.12.2018
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6-3-b - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-b - Adequate facilities;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);No violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-d - Obtain attendance of witnesses;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2018)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară admisă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestă lipsă de temei;Restul inadmisibil (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestă lipsă de temei;Nicio încălcare a Articolului 6+6-3-b - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri penale;Articolul 6-1 - Judecată echitabilă) (Articolul 6-3-b - Mijloace adecvate;Articolul 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil);Nicio încălcare a Articolului 6+6-3-d - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri penale;Articolul 6-1 - Judecată echitabilă) (Articolul 6-3-d - Obținerea prezenței martorilor;Articolul 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-12-18
0,99
CASE OF MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6-3-b - Right to a fa
CtEDO 2018-12-18
0,98
CASE OF MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA
Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6-3-b - Right to a fa
CtEDO 2018-12-18
0,97
Murtazaliyeva v. Russia [GC]
Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6-3-b - Right to a fa
CtEDO 2018-07-17
0,95
CASE OF MARIYA ALEKHINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspec
CtEDO 2019-06-25
0,94
CASE OF NICOLAE VIRGILIU TĂNASE v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Rat
Sursă