CtEDO 18.12.2018 Auto

CASE OF MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA

RESPONDENT
RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
18.12.2018
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6-3-b - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-b - Adequate facilities);No violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-d - Obtain attendance of witnesses)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2018)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară permisă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) În mod evident nefondat; menținerea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) În mod evident nefondat;Nici o încălcare a articolului 6+6-3-b - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procesul penal;art. 6-1 - Audiere echitabilă) (art. 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil;art. 6-3-b - Facilități adecvate);Nr o încălcare a articolului 6+6-3-d - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procesul penal) (art. 6-1 - Audierea echitabilă) (art. 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil;art. 6-3-d - Obținerea prezenței martorilor)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-12-18
0,99
Murtazaliyeva v. Russia [GC]
Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6-3-b - Right to a fa
CtEDO 2018-12-18
0,99
CASE OF MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6-3-b - Right to a fa
CtEDO 2018-12-18
0,98
CASE OF MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6-3-b - Right to a fa
CtEDO 2021-10-19
0,95
CASE OF KARTOYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Public hearing);Violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right
CtEDO 2021-09-21
0,95
CASE OF CARTER v. RUSSIA
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 38 - Examinat
Sursă