CtEDO 31.01.2019 Auto

Rooman v. Belgium [GC]

RESPONDENT
BEL
HOTĂRÂRE
31.01.2019
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Rooman v. Belgium [GC] (CtEDO, 2019)
HUDOC · oficial

Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant) (aspect substanţial);Nici o încălcare a articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant) (aspect substanţial);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate şi securitate (art. 5-1 - Arestarea legală sau detenţie;art. 5-1-e - Persoanele cu minte nesensibilă);Nici o încălcare a art. 5 - Dreptul la libertate şi securitate (art. 5-1 - Arestarea legală sau detenţie legală;art. 5-1-e - Persoanele cu minte nesensibilă); prejudiciu material (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Darocurile nesupunere - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2019-01-31
0,99
CASE OF ROOMAN v. BELGIUM
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right
CtEDO 2019-01-31
0,97
CASE OF ROOMAN v. BELGIUM - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right
CtEDO 2016-09-06
0,96
CASE OF W.D. v. BELGIUM
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind)
CtEDO 2016-09-06
0,96
W.D. v. Belgium
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind)
CtEDO 2016-09-06
0,96
CASE OF W.D. v. BELGIUM - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind)
Sursă