CtEDO 16.04.2019 Auto

Alparslan Altan v. Turkey

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
16.04.2019
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
Alparslan Altan v. Turkey (CtEDO, 2019)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (art. 35-1 – Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 – Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-1 – Arestarea legală sau detenție;Procedură prevăzută prin lege);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 – Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-1 – Arestarea legală sau detenție;art. 5-1-c – Suspiciuni rezonabile); Prejudiciu material - cerere respinsă (art. 41 – Prejudiciu material;Dar satisfacție); Prejudiciu material - atribuire (art. 41 – Prejudiciu moral;Darcarea pecuniare)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2019-04-16
0,99
CASE OF ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. TURKEY
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty
CtEDO 2019-04-16
0,97
CASE OF ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of A
CtEDO 2020-03-03
0,96
CASE OF BAȘ v. TURKEY
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Procedure prescribed by law);Viol
CtEDO 2016-11-22
0,96
Kerman v. Turkey
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3 - Manifestly ill-founded);Remainder inadmissible (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Brought promptly before judge or other officer);Violation of A
CtEDO 2020-03-03
0,96
CASE OF BAȘ v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] summary by Okan Tașdelen
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Procedure prescribed by law);Viol
Sursă