CtEDO 02.05.2019 AI

CASE OF PASQUINI v. SAN MARINO - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
SMR
HOTĂRÂRE
02.05.2019
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Tribunal established by law);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF PASQUINI v. SAN MARINO - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2019)
HUDOC · oficial

Cerere inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate; (Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor de atac interne; (Art. 35-1) Perioada de șase luni; (Art. 35-3-a) Lipsit evident de temei; Nicio încălcare a Articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri civile; Articolul 6-1 - Audiență echitabilă; Tribunal constituit prin lege); Nicio încălcare a Articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri civile; Articolul 6-1 - Tribunal imparțial); Nicio încălcare a Articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri civile; Articolul 6-1 - Acces la instanță)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2019-05-02
0,97
CASE OF PASQUINI v. SAN MARINO
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proce
CtEDO 2019-05-02
0,97
Pasquini v. San Marino
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proce
CtEDO 2018-07-17
0,94
CASE OF MARIYA ALEKHINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspec
CtEDO 2019-06-27
0,94
CASE OF COSMOS MARITIME TRADING AND SHIPPING AGENCY v. UKRAINE - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);Violation of
CtEDO 2018-10-02
0,94
CASE OF MUTU AND PECHSTEIN v. SWITZERLAND - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Disciplinary proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tr
Sursă