CtEDO 26.03.2020 Auto

CASE OF PENDOV v. BULGARIA - [Bulgarian Translation] by the Bulgarian Ministry of Justice

RESPONDENT
BGR
HOTĂRÂRE
26.03.2020
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2020
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF PENDOV v. BULGARIA - [Bulgarian Translation] by the Bulgarian Ministry of Justice (CtEDO, 2020)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs;Încălcarea articoluluiui 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecția proprietăților (art. 1 alin. 2 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Controlul utilizării proprietăților;Încălcarea articoluluiui 10 - Libertatea de exprimare-{general} (art. 10-1 - Libertatea de exprimare); leziuni pecuniare - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Dar satisfacție); prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2020-03-26
0,99
CASE OF PENDOV v. BULGARIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property);Vio
CtEDO 2020-03-26
0,99
CASE OF PENDOV v. BULGARIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by Teodor Papuc
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property);Vio
CtEDO 2020-03-26
0,99
CASE OF PENDOV v. BULGARIA - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Prosecutor General - Minister of Justice
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property);Vio
CtEDO 2020-03-26
0,99
Pendov v. Bulgaria
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property);Vio
CtEDO 2023-10-10
0,96
CASE OF PENGEZOV v. BULGARIA - [Bulgarian Translation] by the Bulgarian Ministry of Justice
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Disciplinary proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);
Sursă