CtEDO 23.11.2021 Auto

CASE OF CENTRE OF SOCIETIES FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS IN RUSSIA AND FROLOV v. RUSSIA

RESPONDENT
RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
23.11.2021
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) read in the light of Article 9 - (Art. 9) Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion;Manifest religion or belief);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF CENTRE OF SOCIETIES FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS IN RUSSIA AND FROLOV v. RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2021)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifest nefondat;Încălcarea art. 9 - Libertatea gândirii, conştiinţei şi religiei (art. 9-1 - Libertatea religiei);Încălcarea art. 11 - Libertatea adunării şi a asocierii (art. 11-1 - Libertatea adunării paşnice) citită în lumina art. 9 - (art. 9 - (art. 3). 9) Libertatea gândirii, conştiinţei şi religiei (art. 9-1 - Libertatea religiei;Religia sau credinţa manifelor); prejudiciu moral - premiu (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacţie)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2021-11-23
0,99
Centre of Societies for Krishna Consciousness in Russia and Frolov v. Russia
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assem
CtEDO 2021-11-23
0,99
CASE OF CENTRE OF SOCIETIES FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS IN RUSSIA AND FROLOV v. RUSSIA - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assem
CtEDO 2016-01-05
0,94
CASE OF FRUMKIN v. RUSSIA
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);V
CtEDO 2023-03-07
0,94
Ossewaarde v. Russia
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month);Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Violation of Article 14+9-1 - P
CtEDO 2021-11-23
0,94
CASE OF CORLEY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Procedural safeguards relating to expulsion of aliens (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Expulsion o
Sursă