CtEDO 23.11.2021 Auto

CASE OF CENTRE OF SOCIETIES FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS IN RUSSIA AND FROLOV v. RUSSIA - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)

RESPONDENT
RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
23.11.2021
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) read in the light of Article 9 - (Art. 9) Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion;Manifest religion or belief);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF CENTRE OF SOCIETIES FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS IN RUSSIA AND FROLOV v. RUSSIA - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM) (CtEDO, 2021)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifest nefondat;Încălcarea art. 9 - Libertatea gândirii, conștiinței și religiei (art. 9-1 - Libertatea religiei);Încălcarea art. 11 - Libertatea adunării și a asocierii (art. 11-1 - Libertatea adunării pașnice) citită în lumina art. 9 - (art. 9 - (art. 3). 9) Libertatea gândirii, conștiinței și religiei (art. 9-1 - Libertatea religiei;Religia sau credința manifelor); prejudiciu moral - premiu (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2021-11-23
0,99
CASE OF CENTRE OF SOCIETIES FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS IN RUSSIA AND FROLOV v. RUSSIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assem
CtEDO 2021-11-23
0,98
Centre of Societies for Krishna Consciousness in Russia and Frolov v. Russia
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assem
CtEDO 2025-05-20
0,94
CASE OF RUSS v. GERMANY - [German Translation] by the German Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) read in the light of Article 10 - (Art.
CtEDO 2025-05-20
0,93
CASE OF RUSS v. GERMANY - [Turkish Translation] summary by Okan Tașdelen
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) read in the light of Article 10 - (Art.
CtEDO 2016-01-05
0,93
CASE OF FRUMKIN v. RUSSIA
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);V
Sursă