CtEDO 23.11.2021 Auto

Centre of Societies for Krishna Consciousness in Russia and Frolov v. Russia

RESPONDENT
RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
23.11.2021
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) read in the light of Article 9 - (Art. 9) Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion;Manifest religion or belief);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Centre of Societies for Krishna Consciousness in Russia and Frolov v. Russia (CtEDO, 2021)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifest nefondat;Încălcarea art. 9 - Libertatea gândirii, conştiinţei şi religiei (art. 9-1 - Libertatea religiei);Încălcarea art. 11 - Libertatea adunării şi a asocierii (art. 11-1 - Libertatea adunării paşnice) citită în lumina art. 9 - (art. 9 - (art. 3). 9) Libertatea gândirii, conştiinţei şi religiei (art. 9-1 - Libertatea religiei;Religia sau credinţa manifelor); prejudiciu moral - premiu (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacţie)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2021-11-23
0,99
CASE OF CENTRE OF SOCIETIES FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS IN RUSSIA AND FROLOV v. RUSSIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assem
CtEDO 2021-11-23
0,98
CASE OF CENTRE OF SOCIETIES FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS IN RUSSIA AND FROLOV v. RUSSIA - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assem
CtEDO 2023-03-07
0,95
Ossewaarde v. Russia
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month);Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Violation of Article 14+9-1 - P
CtEDO 2021-11-23
0,95
CASE OF CORLEY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Procedural safeguards relating to expulsion of aliens (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Expulsion o
CtEDO 2025-05-20
0,94
CASE OF RUSS v. GERMANY
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) read in the light of Article 10 - (Art.
Sursă