ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 31.05.2022 RO

Judgment Arnar Helgi Larusson v. Iceland - No discrimination in wheelchair access to municipal cultural buildings

HOTĂRÂRE
31.05.2022
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Arnar Helgi Larusson v. Iceland - No discrimination in wheelchair access to municipal cultural buildings (CtEDO, 2022)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2020-06-23
0,91
ARNAR HELGI LARUSSON v. ICELAND
Communicated on 23 June 2020 Published on 15 July 2020 FIFTH SECTION Application no. 23077/19 Arnar Helgi LARUSSON against Iceland lodged on 23 April 2019 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the difficulties faced by persons
CtEDO 2022-05-31
0,91
CASE OF ARNAR HELGI LÁRUSSON v. ICELAND - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
NLMR 3/2022-EGMR 1 © Jan Sramek Verlag (http://www.jan-sramek-verlag.at). [Übersetzung wurde bereits in Newsletter Menschenrech- te 2022/3 veröffentlicht] Die erneute Veröffentlichung wurde allein für die Aufnahme in die HUDOC-Datenbank des
CtEDO 2022-05-31
0,89
CASE OF ARNAR HELGI LÁRUSSON v. ICELAND - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic
těžovatele v roce 2015 uplynulo několik let. Pokud obec upřednostnila zlepšení přístupnosti vzdělávacích a sportovních zařízení, měla již dost času také na zlepšení přístupu do veřejných budov, v nichž se nacházejí umělecká a kulturní centr
CtEDO 2022-05-31
0,89
CASE OF ARNAR HELGI LÁRUSSON v. ICELAND - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Tradus și revizuit de IER (http://ier.gov.ro/) CURTEA EUROPEANĂ A DREPTURILOR OMULUI SECȚIA A TREIA CAUZA ARNAR HELGI LÁRUSSON ÎMPOTRIVA ISLANDEI (Cererea nr. 23077/19) HOTĂRÂRE Art. 14 (+ art. 8) • Obligații pozitive • Absența discriminări
CtEDO 2024-06-03
0,88
GHERGHINA v. ROMANIA
can he still claim to be a victim with respect to those allegations within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention? 3. If so, has the applicant suffered discrimination on account of his locomotor disability in the enjoyment of his right
Sursă