CtEDO 15.09.2022 Auto

CASE OF VADYM MELNYK v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine

RESPONDENT
UKR
HOTĂRÂRE
15.09.2022
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-4) Rejection of application at any stage of the proceedings;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF VADYM MELNYK v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine (CtEDO, 2022)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifest nefondat; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae; (Art. 35-4) Respingerea aplicării în orice etapă a procedurii;Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant) (aspect de susținere);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-1 - Arestarea legală sau detenție);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-3 - Raționalitatea de detenție preventivă);Nicio încălcare a articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-4 - Revizuirea legii de detenție); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-09-15
1,00
CASE OF VADYM MELNYK v. UKRAINE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-4) Rejection of application at any stage of the proceedings;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture
CtEDO 2021-01-21
0,96
CASE OF KADURA AND SMALIY v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspec
CtEDO 2021-01-21
0,96
CASE OF KADURA AND SMALIY v. UKRAINE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspec
CtEDO 2022-09-15
0,96
AFFAIRE VADYM MELNYK c. UKRAINE
Partiellement irrecevable (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestement mal fondé;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-4) Rejet de la requête à tout stade de la procédure;Violation de l'article 3 - Interdiction de la t
CtEDO 2025-07-17
0,95
CASE OF OPALENKO v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Ar
Sursă