CtEDO 19.12.2023 Auto

CASE OF NARBUTAS v. LITHUANIA

RESPONDENT
LTU
HOTĂRÂRE
19.12.2023
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2023
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
CASE OF NARBUTAS v. LITHUANIA (CtEDO, 2023)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs;Nici o încălcare a articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant;Tratament inhuman) (aspect substantiv);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-1 - Privilegea libertății;Procedură prescrisă prin lege);Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și de familie (art. 8-1 - Respectarea vieții private);Încălcarea articoluluiui 10 - Libertatea de expresie - {general} (art. 10-1 - Libertatea de expresie);Încălcarea articoluluiui 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecţia proprietăţilor (art. 1 alin. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Distracţia păcioasă a bunurilor;art. 1 alin. 2 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Controlul utilizării proprietăţilor);Leziuni pecuniare şi morale - atribuire (art. 41 - Leziuni morale;Leziuni pecuniare;Dar satisfacţie)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2023-12-19
0,98
CASE OF NARBUTAS v. LITHUANIA - [Croatian Translation] summary by the Office of the representative of the Republic of Croatia
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Art
CtEDO 2023-12-19
0,94
AFFAIRE NARBUTAS c. LITUANIE
Partiellement irrecevable (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-1) Épuisement des voies de recours internes;Non-violation de l'article 3 - Interdiction de la torture (Article 3 - Traitement dégradant;Traitement inhumain) (Volet maté
CtEDO 2018-05-31
0,94
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Six-month peri
CtEDO 2007-09-11
0,94
CASE OF L. v. LITHUANIA
Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of
CtEDO 2018-05-31
0,94
Abu Zubaydah v. Lithuania
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Six-month peri
Sursă