CtEDO
21.06.2011
Auto
CASE OF ORLOV v. RUSSIA
RESPONDENT
RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
21.06.2011
Pe scurt
- Instanță
- CtEDO
- Concluzie
- Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment);Violation of Article 6+6-3 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6-3-b - Preparation of defence;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance);No violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of application);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Citează această cauză
CASE OF ORLOV v. RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2011)
Restul inadmisibil;Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant;Tratament inhuman) (Tratament incompatibil);Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament incompatibil);Încălcarea articoluluiui 13+3 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediare eficace) (art. 3 - Interzicerea torturii;Tratament incompatibil);Încălcarea articoluluiui 6+6-3 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Audierea echitabilă) (art. 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil) (art. 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil);art. 6-3 - Drepturile de apărare (art. 6-3-b - Prepararea apărării;art. 6-3-c - Apărarea prin asistență juridică);Dart. 34 - art. 34 - art. 34 - Incomunicarea
§ Cauze similare
5 cauze