CtEDO
23.05.2024
Auto
CASE OF SAAKASHVILI v. GEORGIA - [Georgian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Georgia, Human Rights Centre of the Analytical Department
RESPONDENT
GEO
HOTĂRÂRE
23.05.2024
Pe scurt
- Instanță
- CtEDO
- Concluzie
- Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);No violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-d - Witnesses);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nullum crimen sine lege;Conviction;Criminal offence)
Citează această cauză
CASE OF SAAKASHVILI v. GEORGIA - [Georgian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Georgia, Human Rights Centre of the Analytical Department (CtEDO, 2024)
Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) În mod evident nefondat;Nici o încălcare a articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procesul penal;art. 6-1 - Tribunalul Imparial;Tribunal independent);Nici o încălcare a articolului 6+6-3-d - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procesul penal;art. 6-1 - Audiere echitabilă) (art. 6-3 - Drepturile de apărare;art. 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil;art. 6-3-d - Martorii);Nici o încălcare a articolului 7 - Nicio pedeapsă fără lege (art. 7-1 - Nullum crimen sine lege;Conviction;Criminalitate)
§ Cauze similare
5 cauze