CtEDO 23.05.2024 Auto

CASE OF SAAKASHVILI v. GEORGIA - [Georgian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Georgia, Human Rights Centre of the Analytical Department

RESPONDENT
GEO
HOTĂRÂRE
23.05.2024
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);No violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-d - Witnesses);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nullum crimen sine lege;Conviction;Criminal offence)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2024
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF SAAKASHVILI v. GEORGIA - [Georgian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Georgia, Human Rights Centre of the Analytical Department (CtEDO, 2024)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) În mod evident nefondat;Nici o încălcare a articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procesul penal;art. 6-1 - Tribunalul Imparial;Tribunal independent);Nici o încălcare a articolului 6+6-3-d - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procesul penal;art. 6-1 - Audiere echitabilă) (art. 6-3 - Drepturile de apărare;art. 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil;art. 6-3-d - Martorii);Nici o încălcare a articolului 7 - Nicio pedeapsă fără lege (art. 7-1 - Nullum crimen sine lege;Conviction;Criminalitate)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2024-05-23
0,99
CASE OF SAAKASHVILI v. GEORGIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);No viola
CtEDO 2024-05-23
0,98
Saakashvili v. Georgia
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);No viola
CtEDO 2024-12-05
0,96
CASE OF KEZERASHVILI v. GEORGIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartia
CtEDO 2022-09-01
0,96
CASE OF MAKARASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA - [Georgian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Georgia, Human Rights Centre of the Analytical Department
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6 - Ri
CtEDO 2019-10-10
0,95
Batiashvili v. Georgia
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial de
Sursă