CtEDO 15.01.2013 Auto

CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

RESPONDENT
GBR
HOTĂRÂRE
15.01.2013
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2013
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (CtEDO, 2013)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistare inadmisibilă;Încălcarea articoluluiui 9 - Libertatea conștiinței și religiei gândite (art. 9-1 - Religie sau convingeri);Nu are încălcarea articolului 9 - Libertatea conștiinței și a religiei gândite (art. 9 - Religie sau convingeri manifestate);Nu are încălcarea articolului 14+9 - Interzicerea discriminării (art. 14 - Discriminare) (art. 9 - Libertatea conștiinței gândite și a religiilor manifestate);art. 9 - Religie sau convingeri manifestate);Nu are încălcarea articolului 9 - Libertatea conștiinței și a religiei manifestate;art. 9 - Religie sau convingeri manifestate);Distrucțiuni pecuniare - a respins;

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2013-01-15
1,00
Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion o
CtEDO 2013-01-15
0,98
CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Romanian Translation] by the COE Human Rights Trust Fund
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion o
CtEDO 2013-01-15
0,98
CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the COE Human Rights Trust Fund
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion o
CtEDO 2011-04-12
0,93
EWEIDA AND CHAPLIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
A applies to B a provision, criterion or practice which he applies or would apply equally to persons not of the same religion or belief as B, but - (i) which puts or would put persons of the same religion or belief as B at a particular disa
CtEDO 2023-03-07
0,91
CASE OF OSSEWAARDE v. RUSSIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month);Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Violation of Article 14+9-1 - P
Sursă