CtEDO 15.01.2013 AI

CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Romanian Translation] by the COE Human Rights Trust Fund

RESPONDENT
GBR
HOTĂRÂRE
15.01.2013
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2013
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Romanian Translation] by the COE Human Rights Trust Fund (CtEDO, 2013)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil; Încălcarea Articolului 9 - Libertatea de gândire, conștiință și religie (Articolul 9-1 - Manifestarea religiei sau a convingerilor); Nicio încălcare a Articolului 9 - Libertatea de gândire, conștiință și religie (Articolul 9-1 - Manifestarea religiei sau a convingerilor); Nicio încălcare a Articolului 14+9 - Interzicerea discriminării (Articolul 14 - Discriminarea) (Articolul 9 - Libertatea de gândire, conștiință și religie; Articolul 9-1 - Manifestarea religiei sau a convingerilor); Nicio încălcare a Articolului 9 - Libertatea de gândire, conștiință și religie (Articolul 9-1 - Manifestarea religiei sau a convingerilor); Nicio încălcare a Articolului 14+9 - Interzicerea discriminării (Articolul 14 - Discriminarea) (Articolul 9 - Libertatea de gândire, conștiință și religie; Articolul 9-1 - Manifestarea religiei sau a convingerilor); Daune patrimoniale - pretenție respinsă; Daune morale - hotărâre de acordare.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2013-01-15
1,00
CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the COE Human Rights Trust Fund
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion o
CtEDO 2013-01-15
0,98
CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion o
CtEDO 2013-01-15
0,98
Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion o
CtEDO 2011-04-12
0,92
EWEIDA AND CHAPLIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
A applies to B a provision, criterion or practice which he applies or would apply equally to persons not of the same religion or belief as B, but - (i) which puts or would put persons of the same religion or belief as B at a particular disa
CtEDO 2019-10-24
0,92
CASE OF J.D. AND A v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
No violation of Article 14+P1-1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property);Violation of Arti
Sursă