ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 02.04.2013 Auto

CASE OF MEHMET SALİH UÇAR v. TURKEY

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
02.04.2013
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2013
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
CASE OF MEHMET SALİH UÇAR v. TURKEY (CtEDO, 2013)
HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1965 și trăiește în Batman. În octombrie 2000, reclamantul a depus un caz la Curtea Administrativă Diyarbakır împotriva Ministerului Internului pentru anularea unei decizii administrative care refuză cererea de compensare a handicapului. La 20 octombrie 2000, instanța a emis o hotărâre de nejurisprudență și a transferat cazul la Curtea Administrativă din Ankara, care a respins cererea reclamantului la 10 martie 2003. La 22 martie 2005, Curtea Administrativă Supremă a susținut hotărârea din 10 martie 2003. La 12 iulie 2006, cererea de rectificare a reclamantului introdusă la 25 martie 2005 a fost respinsă de Curtea Supremă Administrativă. La 24 august 2006, hotărârea a fost notificată reclamantului.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-06-13
0,92
CASE OF TUNÇ v. TURKEY
5. The applicant was born in 1965 and lives in Ankara. 6. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 7. On 13 April 2010 the applicant was dismissed from his post as an officer in the army due to non-c
CtEDO 2018-11-27
0,92
CASE OF MİKAİL TÜZÜN v. TURKEY
. 5. On 26 June 2017 the Government were given notice of the applicant’s remaining complaint. THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6. The applicant was born in 1960 and lives in Istanbul. 7. On 11 December 1995 the applicant, a traffi
CtEDO 2017-10-10
0,91
CASE OF PALİTKIRAN v. TURKEY
5. The applicant was born in 1989 and lives in Manisa. 6. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 7. On 7 July 2009 the applicant was dismissed from the Expert Gendarmerie School due to non-complian
CtEDO 2012-04-24
0,91
CASE OF MEHMET NURİ ÇAÇAN v. TURKEY
4. The applicant was born in 1970 and lives in Bitlis. 5. On 29 April 2000 the applicant was arrested and imprisoned after a criminal conviction. 6. During the imprisonment it was found that the applicant was mistakenly incarcerated due to
CtEDO 2017-11-28
0,91
CASE OF ÜÇEL v. TURKEY
5. The applicant was born in 1985 and lives in Denizli. 6. On 13 June 2009 the applicant was dismissed from the Expert Gendarmerie School due to non-compliance with disciplinary rules. Subsequently, he initiated proceedings before the Supre
Sursă