AFFAIRE MOTION PICTURES GUARANTORS LTD CONTRE LA SERBIE

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2013)72 Motion Pictures Guarantors împotriva Serbiei Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (Recherche n 28353/06, Hotărârea din 08/06/2010, definitivă la 08/09/2010) (adoptată de Comitetul de Miniștri la 30 aprilie 2013, cu ocazia celei de-a 1169-a ședințe a delegaților miniștrilor) Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede ca Comitetul să supravegheze executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumite în continuare "convenția" și "Curtea"), Având în vedere hotărârea definitivă, care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului în cauza de mai sus și încălcarea constatată reamintind obligația statului pârât, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (1) (1) din Convenție, să se conformeze hotărârilor definitive în litigiile la care este parte și că această obligație implică, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte, adoptarea de către autoritățile din statul membru în cauză, dacă este necesar de măsuri individuale pentru a pune capăt încălcărilor constatate și pentru a elimina consecințele acestora, în măsura posibilului de către Restitutio in integrum de măsuri generale de prevenire a unor încălcări similare ; Am invitat guvernul statului pârât să informeze Comitetul cu privire la măsurile luate pentru a se conforma obligației După examinarea bilanțului de acțiune furnizat de guvern care indică măsurile adoptate în vederea executării hotărârii și notarea faptului că a fost acordată o satisfacție echitabilă de către Curte în prezenta cauză (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2013) DECLAMENTUL pe care și l-a îndeplinit în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenție în această cauză și DECIDE d . Acțiune reportare Motion Pictures Guarantors v. Serbia (nr. 28353/06) judgment of 8 June 2010, final on 8 September 2010 (numai în limba engleză) Case description Această rubrică se referă la încălcarea dreptului public al unei societăți comerciale, adversarial hearing before the content scurt (violation of Article 6§1). II. Individual Measures Reopening of the procesing The European Court noted that the applicant company might choose to make use of Article 422.10 of the Civil Procedure Act, which provides that a case may be reopened if the European Court has in the meantime rendred a judgment in respect of Serbia priving the same or a similarar legal issue (§26 and 21 of the judgment). Pursuant to the foregoing legal provision, the applicant company requested reopening of the impugned proceedings. In this respect, on 1 November 2012, the Commercial Court of Belgrad rendred a decision granting leave for their reopening. Pursuant to the foregoing decision of the Commercial Court of Belgrad, the impugned decisions of 13 September 2005, 26 September 2005 and 19 decembrie 2005 were quashed (see details on these decisions in §9, 11 and 13 of the Judgment). The applicant company did not claim just satisfaction in respect of moraly and pecuniary damage sustained. The European Court prin urmare made no award under this head. In view of the abovefacts, the Government of Serbia considers that the individual Measures undertaken have fully remedied the consecvencess of the violation of the convention found by the European Court in this case. III. General Measures The Government of Serbia considers that the violation of this case occurred as a result of an izolated incident. It prin urmare deems that the publicity and disemination of the Court The judgment had been translated into Serbian and its translation, together with the original in English, was publicished in the Official Newsletter of the Republic of Serbia (No. 42 dated 18 June 2010), as well as on the website of the Agent (www.zastupnik.ampravde.gov.rs) and on the website of the Paragraph in the co Operation with the office of the Agent. The Agent also forwarded the translation of the mentioned judgment to the Supreme Court of Cassation of Serbia, which distributed the Court The just satisfaction was paid to the aplicant on 1 November 2010. Concluzie In view of the abovefacts, the Government of Serbia considers that the measures adopted have fully remedied the consecințes of the violation of the convention found by the European Court in this case. Sensul general Measures the Government of Serbia deems that the disemination and publicity of the judgment will prevent similar încălcări in viitor. Serbia has thus compliment with its obligations under Article 46 paragraph 1 of the Convention.

Résolution CM/ResDH(2013)72

Motion Pictures Guarantors contre Serbie

Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme

(Requête n

o

28353/06, arrêt du 08/06/2010, définitif le 08/09/2010)

(adoptée par le Comité de Ministres le 30 avril 2013,

lors de la 1169e réunion des Délégués des Ministres)

Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit que le Comité surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «

la Convention

» et «

la Cour

»),

Vu l’arrêt définitif, qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité dans l’affaire ci-dessus et la violation constatée

;

Rappelant l’obligation de l’Etat défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe

1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels il est partie et que cette obligation implique, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour, l’adoption par les autorités de l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire

:

-

de mesures individuelles pour mettre fin aux violations constatées et en effacer les conséquences, dans la mesure du possible par

restitutio in integrum

;

et

-

de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ;

Ayant invité le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur à informer le Comité des mesures prises pour se conformer à l’obligation susmentionnée

;

Ayant examiné le bilan d’action fourni par le gouvernement indiquant les mesures adoptées afin d’exécuter l’arrêt et notant qu’aucune satisfaction équitable n’a été octroyée par la Cour dans la présente affaire (voir document

DH-DD(2013)120

E)

;

S’étant assuré que toutes les mesures requises par l’article 46, paragraphe 1, ont été adoptées,

DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et

DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.

Action report

Motion Pictures Guarantors v. Serbia (No. 28353/06)

judgment of 8 June 2010, final on 8 September 2010

(anglais seulement)

I.

Case description

The case concerns the violation of the applicant company’s right to a public hearing in that their request for procedural reinstatement had been rejected without a public, adversarial hearing before the competent court (violation of Article 6§1).

II.

Individual measures

Reopening of the proceedings

The European Court noted that the applicant company might choose to make use of Article 422.10 of the Civil Procedure Act, which provides that a case may be reopened if the European Court has in the meantime rendered a judgment in respect of Serbia concerning the same or a similar legal issue (§§26 and 21 of the judgment).

Pursuant to the foregoing legal provision, the applicant company requested reopening of the impugned proceedings. In this respect, on 1 November 2012, the Commercial Court of Belgrade rendered a decision granting leave for their reopening. Pursuant to the foregoing decision of the Commercial Court of Belgrade, the impugned decisions of 13 September 2005, 26 September 2005 and 19 December 2005 were quashed (see details on these decisions in §§9, 11 and 13 of the judgment).

The applicant company did not claim just satisfaction in respect of non-pecuniary and pecuniary damage sustained. The European Court therefore made no award under this head.

In view of the above facts, the Government of Serbia considers that the individual measures undertaken have fully remedied the consequences of the violation of the Convention found by the European Court in this case.

III.

General measures

The Government of Serbia considers that the violation of this case occurred as a result of an isolated incident. It therefore deems that the publication and dissemination of the Court’s judgment would suffice to prevent similar violations.

Dissemination and publication

The judgment had been translated into Serbian and its translation, together with the original in English, was published in the Official Bulletin of the Republic of Serbia (No. 42 dated 18 June 2010), as well as on the website of the Agent (www.zastupnik.mpravde.gov.rs) and on the website of the

Paragraph

in the co

‑

operation with the office of the Agent. The Agent also forwarded the translation of the mentioned judgment to the Supreme Court of Cassation of Serbia, which distributed the Court’s judgment to all courts in the country.

IV.

Payment of cost and expenses

The European Court awarded the applicant only the compensation in respect of costs and expenses (EUR

1

000) in RSD equivalent. The just satisfaction was paid to the applicant on 1 November 2010.

V.

Conclusion

In view of the above facts, the Government of Serbia considers that the measures adopted have fully remedied the consequences of the violation of the Convention found by the European Court in this case. Concerning the general measures the Government of Serbia deems that the dissemination and publication of the judgment will prevent similar violations in future. Serbia has thus complied with its obligations under Article 46 paragraph 1 of the Convention.