CtEDO 23.07.2013 AI

CASE OF M.A. v. CYPRUS - [Romanian Translation] summary by the COE Human Rights Trust Fund

RESPONDENT
CYP
HOTĂRÂRE
23.07.2013
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 13+2 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 2 - Right to life;Expulsion);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Expulsion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law;Article 5-1-f - Expulsion);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-2 - Information on reasons for arrest);No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Non-pecuniary damage - award
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2013
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF M.A. v. CYPRUS - [Romanian Translation] summary by the COE Human Rights Trust Fund (CtEDO, 2013)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil; Încălcarea Articolului 13+2 - Dreptul la un remediu efectiv (Articolul 13 - Remediu efectiv) (Articolul 2 - Dreptul la viață; Expulzare); Încălcarea Articolului 13+3 - Dreptul la un remediu efectiv (Articolul 13 - Remediu efectiv) (Articolul 3 - Interzicerea torturii; Expulzare); Încălcarea Articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-4 - Celeritate a controlului); Încălcarea Articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-1 - Privarea de libertate; Arestare sau detenție legală; Procedură prescrisă de lege; Articolul 5-1-f - Expulzare); Nicio încălcare a Articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-2 - Informare despre motivele arestării); Nicio încălcare a Articolului 4 din Protocolul nr. 4 - Interzicerea expulzării colective a străinilor-{general} (Articolul 4 din Protocolul nr. 4 - Interzicerea expulzării colective a străinilor); Daune nemateriale - acordare.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2013-07-23
1,00
CASE OF M.A. v. CYPRUS - [Romanian Translation] by the COE Human Rights Trust Fund
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 13+2 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 2 - Right to life;Expulsion);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (
CtEDO 2013-07-23
0,99
CASE OF M.A. v. CYPRUS - [Romanian translation] legal summary by the IER (Institutului European din România)
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 13+2 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 2 - Right to life;Expulsion);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy
CtEDO 2024-10-08
0,94
CASE OF M.A. AND Z.R. v. CYPRUS
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Pro
CtEDO 2014-07-03
0,93
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (I) - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the COE Human Rights Trust Fund
haustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Violation of Article 4 of Protoc
CtEDO 2007-11-27
0,93
CASE OF POPOVICI v. MOLDOVA - [Romanian Translation] by the P.A. "Lawyers for Human Rights"
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-tria
Sursă