CtEDO 13.01.2015 Auto

CASE OF IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. ROMANIA

RESPONDENT
ROU
HOTĂRÂRE
13.01.2015
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Prohibition of torture);Violation of Article 13+5-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 5-1 - Procedure prescribed by law;Article 5 - Right to liberty and security);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2015
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. ROMANIA (CtEDO, 2015)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil;Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant;Tratament inhuman);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-1 - Privire de libertate;Procedură prescrisă prin lege);Încălcarea articoluluiui 13+3 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediare eficace) (art. 3 - Tratament degradant;Prohibirea torturii);Încălcarea articoluluiui 13+5-1 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediare eficace) (art. 5 - Procedură prescrisă prin lege;art. 5 - Drept la libertate și securitate); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2016-04-26
0,96
CASE OF AMARANDEI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violatio
CtEDO 2016-04-26
0,96
CASE OF AMARANDEI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violatio
CtEDO 2015-01-13
0,95
AFFAIRE IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU c. ROUMANIE
Partiellement irrecevable;Violation de l'article 3 - Interdiction de la torture (Article 3 - Traitement dégradant;Traitement inhumain) (Volet matériel);Violation de l'article 5 - Droit à la liberté et à la sûreté (Article 5-1 - Privation de
CtEDO 2016-05-31
0,95
CASE OF COMORAȘU v. ROMANIA
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation
CtEDO 2016-05-31
0,95
CASE OF COMORAȘU v. ROMANIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation
Sursă