CtEDO 21.02.2017 RO

Judgment Rubio Dosamantes v. Spain - right of a person to effective protection of their private life

HOTĂRÂRE
21.02.2017
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Judgment Rubio Dosamantes v. Spain - right of a person to effective protection of their private life (CtEDO, 2017)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-09-22
0,90
CASE OF RUBIO DOSAMANTES AGAINST SPAIN
Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)227 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Rubio Dosamantes against Spain (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 22 September 2022 at the 1443 rd meeting of the Ministers' Deputies) Appli
CtEDO 2019-07-10
0,88
ȚIRIAC v. ROMANIA
in balance, in the light of the criteria established in the Court’s case-law, the applicant’s right for respect for private life and the defendants’ right to freedom of expression (see Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and
CtEDO 2019-07-10
0,88
OROS v. ROMANIA and 1 other application
an interference with the applicants’ right to private life within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention having regard to the content of the article in question (see Petrie c. Italy, no. 25322/12, § 39, 18 May 2017, Axel Springer AG
CtEDO 2024-09-17
0,88
CASE OF PINDO MULLA v. SPAIN - [Spanish Translation] by the Spanish Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for pr
CtEDO 2024-09-17
0,88
CASE OF PINDO MULLA v. SPAIN
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for pr
Sursă