CtEDO 30.05.2017 AI

CASE OF VARDANEAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
MDA;RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
30.05.2017
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Independent tribunal);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Independent tribunal);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for home);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for home);No violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of application)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF VARDANEAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2017)
HUDOC · oficial

Nu există încălcare a Articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-1 - Arestarea sau deținerea legală);Încălcare a Articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-1 - Arestarea sau deținerea legală);Nu există încălcare a Articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Procedura penală;Articolul 6-1 - Tribunal independent);Încălcare a Articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Procedura penală;Articolul 6-1 - Tribunal independent);Nu există încălcare a Articolului 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și de familie (Articolul 8-1 - Respectarea vieții de familie;Respectarea domiciliului);Încălcare a Articolului 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și de familie (Articolul 8-1 - Respectarea vieții de familie;Respectarea domiciliului);Nu există încălcare a Articolului 34 - Petiții individuale (Articolul 34 - Îngrădirea exercitării dreptului de petiție).

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-05-30
0,95
CASE OF APCOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degradin
CtEDO 2021-07-13
0,94
CASE OF CILEI AND ROSIP v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) (Russia);No vio
CtEDO 2019-09-17
0,94
CASE OF BERZAN AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman t
CtEDO 2016-02-23
0,94
CASE OF MOZER v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 -
CtEDO 2019-07-02
0,94
CASE OF ANTONOV AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman t
Sursă