CtEDO 06.02.2025 RO

Judgment Italgomme Pneumatici S.r.l. v. Italy - Italy must bring its legislation and practice into line with the Court’s findings on tax-related inspections and audits of business premises

HOTĂRÂRE

06.02.2025

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Judgment Italgomme Pneumatici S.r.l. v. Italy - Italy must bring its legislation and practice into line with the Court’s findings on tax-related inspections and audits of business premises (CtEDO, 2025)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2022-05-24

0,90

ITALGOMME PNEUMATICI S.R.L. v. ITALY and 12 other applications

Published on 13 June 2022 FIRST SECTION Application no. 36617/18 ITALGOMME PNEUMATICI S.R.L. against Italy and 12 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 24 May 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The applications concern search

CtEDO 2026-03-05

0,90

CASE OF EDILSUD 2014 S.R.L. SEMPLIFICATA AND FERRERI v. ITALY

which had its registered office at the home of its legal representative and sole owner, who is the second applicant. 2. Authorisation to carry out the inspection was issued, at the request of the local head of the Revenue Police ( Guardia d

CtEDO 2025-12-11

0,88

CASE OF AGRISUD 2014 S.R.L. SEMPLIFICATA AND OTHERS v. ITALY

considered sufficient to delimit the scope of the authorities’ discretion in the absence of any transparent public information as to which business premises are inspected over time (ibid., §§ 112-13). In this regard, it appears from facts s

CtEDO 2023-07-10

0,87

GRECO AND BORDA v. ITALY

50705/11 and 6 others, § 215, 13 July 2021); c) whether the prohibition of proving the lawful origin of the assets on the basis of incomes which had not been declared to the tax authorities imposed an excessive burden on the applicants; d)

CtEDO 2024-06-18

0,87

GINOCCHIO v. ITALY

les established in the Court’s case-law (see Gutsanovi v. Bulgaria, no. 34529/10, § 223, ECHR 2013 (extracts)); (v) whether the measure was subjected to a sufficient ex post factum judicial scrutiny, considering that, in accordance with the

Sursă