CtEDO 08.02.2018 Auto

CASE OF BEN FAIZA v. FRANCE

RESPONDENT
FRA
HOTĂRÂRE
08.02.2018
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF BEN FAIZA v. FRANCE (CtEDO, 2018)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 34) Aplicații individuale;(Art. 34) Victima;Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de respectare a vieții private și a vieții familiale (art. 8-1 - Respectul vieții private);Nici o încălcare a articolului 8 - Dreptul de respectare a vieții private și a vieții familiale (art. 8-1 - Respectul corespondenței;Respectul vieții private);Distrugerea pecuniară - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Dar satisfacție); Prejudiciu moral - constatarea unei încălcări suficiente (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-02-08
0,95
AFFAIRE BEN FAIZA c. FRANCE
Partiellement irrecevable (Art. 34) Requêtes individuelles;(Art. 34) Victime;Violation de l'article 8 - Droit au respect de la vie privée et familiale (Article 8-1 - Respect de la vie privée);Non-violation de l'article 8 - Droit au respect
CtEDO 2017-04-06
0,94
CASE OF A.P., GARÇON AND NICOT v. FRANCE
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life
CtEDO 2025-01-16
0,94
CASE OF A.C. v. FRANCE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1
CtEDO 2025-01-16
0,94
A.C. v. France
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1
CtEDO 2017-04-06
0,94
CASE OF A.P., GARÇON AND NICOT v. FRANCE - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to res
Sursă