CtEDO 02.10.2018 RO

Judgment Bivolaru v. Romania (no. 2) - sexual intercourse with a minor: conviction at appeal stage without hearing the accused in person

HOTĂRÂRE

02.10.2018

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Judgment Bivolaru v. Romania (no. 2) - sexual intercourse with a minor: conviction at appeal stage without hearing the accused in person (CtEDO, 2018)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2018-04-04

0,88

CASE OF BIVOLARU AGAINST ROMANIA

Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)140 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Bivolaru against Romania (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 4 April 2018 at the 1312 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Application No.

CtEDO 2019-06-25

0,87

CASE OF NICOLAE VIRGILIU TĂNASE v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova

Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Rat

CtEDO 2018-07-19

0,87

CASE OF S.M. v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova

sale. Din cauza vulnerabilității victimelor infracțiunilor legate de viața sexuală, întâlnirea cu T.M. în sala de judecată ar fi putut avea un efect negativ asupra reclamantei, indiferent dacă T.M. a fost înlăturat ulterior din sala de jude

CtEDO 2020-01-16

0,87

A.E.J. v. ROMANIA

Communicated on 16 January 2020 Published on 3 February 2020 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 33463/18 A.E.J. against Romania lodged on 10 July 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the authorities’ alleged failure to condu

CtEDO 2022-02-22

0,87

A v. POLAND

A no. 91; A and B v. Croatia, no. 7144/15, 20 June 2019; and A.P. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 41086/12, 26 October 2021)? 2. Was the manner in which the Act on the Procedure in Juvenile Cases was applied in the present case by the domes

Sursă