Decision Maris v. Romania - refusal to rectify an inmate’s religion in his prison file

CtEDO 2020-10-20 0,87

that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. 20. Accordingly the Court considers that the application is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accord

CtEDO 2021-06-01 0,87

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discriminatio

CtEDO 2015-01-20 0,87

, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention in so far as they relate to the complaints about the applicant’s conditions of dete

CtEDO 2021-11-09 0,87

fulness of his detention could be examined by the courts, as required by Article 5 § 4 of the Convention. 36. However, in the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence,

CtEDO 2015-05-19 0,86

Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3 - Manifestly ill-founded;Ratione materiae);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair tria