CtEDO 05.04.2022 Auto

CASE OF CĂLIN v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania

RESPONDENT
ROU
HOTĂRÂRE
05.04.2022
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF CĂLIN v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania (CtEDO, 2022)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecția preliminară aderată la fonduri și respinsă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs;Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedura penală;art. 6-1 - Timpul rezonabil);Încălcarea articoluluiui 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecția proprietăților (art. 1 alin. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Distracția păcioasă a bunurilor;art. 1 alin. 2 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Controlul utilizării proprietăților);Leziuni pecuniare - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Leziuni pecuniare;Să satisfacem);Leziuni pecuniare - atribuire (art. 41 - Leziuni morale;Să satisfacem)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-04-05
1,00
CASE OF CĂLIN v. ROMANIA
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time
CtEDO 2021-11-16
0,96
N. v. Romania (no. 2)
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already examined by the Court;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic rem
CtEDO 2021-11-16
0,95
CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA (No. 2)
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already examined by the Court;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic rem
CtEDO 2020-10-20
0,95
Camelia Bogdan v. Romania
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6
CtEDO 2021-11-16
0,95
CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA (No. 2) - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already examined by the
Sursă