CtEDO 14.12.2023 RO

Advisory opinion as to whether an individual may be denied authorisation to work as a security guard or officer on account of being close to or belonging to a religious movement - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)

RESPONDENT
BEL
HOTĂRÂRE
14.12.2023
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2023
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Advisory opinion as to whether an individual may be denied authorisation to work as a security guard or officer on account of being close to or belonging to a religious movement - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM) (CtEDO, 2023)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2023-05-23
0,88
CASE OF A.E. v. BULGARIA - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Positive obligations) (Substa
CtEDO 2021-07-20
0,87
CASE OF POLAT v. AUSTRIA - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Violation of Article 8+9 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion;Article 9-1 -
CtEDO 2021-05-25
0,87
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for
CtEDO 2022-02-17
0,87
CASE OF Y v. POLAND - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection joined to merits (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection joined to merits (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;No violation of Article 8 - Right to
CtEDO 2021-03-30
0,87
CASE OF RIBCHEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violat
Sursă