ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 17.04.2012 Auto

CASE OF ILYUSHKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

RESPONDENT
RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
17.04.2012
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2012
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
CASE OF ILYUSHKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2012)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecția preliminară aderată la fonduri și a respins (art. 35-1 – Epuizarea recoursurilor interne);Renunțare inadmisibilă;Încălcarea articoluluiui 13 – Dreptul la o soluție eficace (art. 13 – Remediare eficace);Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 – Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 – Procedură civilă;art. 6-1 – Audiere echitabilă);Încălcarea articoluluiui 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecția proprietăților (art. 1 alin. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Distracție pașnică a bunurilor); prejudiciu material și moral - premiu

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-02-27
0,91
CASE OF ISAYKIN v. RUSSIA
January 2012). 13. If a convicted person wishes to take part in appeal hearing, he or she must indicate this request in his or her statement of appeal (Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, Article 375 § 2). 14. The failure
CtEDO 2019-12-19
0,91
CASE OF VORONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
], nos. 45162/13 and 4 others, 14 June 2018). 16. As concerns all of the applications in the present case, the Court notes that in the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, it already found a violation in respe
CtEDO 2017-04-25
0,91
CASE OF ISAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
in their favour. They invoked Article 6 of the Convention. In the Strelkov case the applicant in addition invoked Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see the Appendix). The relevant parts of the aforementioned provisions read: Ar
CtEDO 2013-11-26
0,90
OGLOBLINA v. RUSSIA
. Romania (dec.), no. 38197/03, § 33, 28 June 2011). 28. In the case at hand, the applicant does not have any arguable claim under Article 8. Indeed, she did not prove that she had been personally affected by the actions of authorities comp
CtEDO 2017-10-12
0,90
CASE OF BELONOZHKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
on Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention and on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, which read as follows: Article 6 § 1 “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations... everyone is entitled to a fair... hearing... by [a]... t
Sursă