CtEDO 03.07.2012 AI

CASE OF LUTSENKO v. UKRAINE - [Romanian Translation] summary by the COE/ECHR

RESPONDENT
UKR
HOTĂRÂRE
03.07.2012
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law;Article 5-1-c - Bringing before competent legal authority);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-2 - Information on reasons for arrest;Prompt information);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review;Review of lawfulness of detention);Violation of Article 18+5 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security);Non-pecuniary damage - award
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2012
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF LUTSENKO v. UKRAINE - [Romanian Translation] summary by the COE/ECHR (CtEDO, 2012)
HUDOC · oficial

Excepție preliminară unită pe fond și respingă (Articolul 35-1 - Epuizarea căilor de atac interne);Încălcare a Articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-1 - Privarea de libertate; Arestare sau detenție legală; Procedură prevăzută de lege; Articolul 5-1-c - Prezentarea înaintea unei autorități competente); Încălcare a Articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-2 - Informarea cu privire la motivele arestării; Informare promptă); Încălcare a Articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-3 - Caracterul rezonabil al detenției preventive); Încălcare a Articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-4 - Garanții procedurale de control; Controlul legalității detenției); Încălcare a Articolului 18+5 - Limitarea utilizării restricțiilor asupra drepturilor (Articolul 18 - Restricții pentru scopuri neautorizate) (Articolul 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate); Prejudiciu moral - acordare de despăgubiri

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2014-04-17
0,95
CASE OF ANATOLIY RUDENKO v. UKRAINE
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Bringing before competent legal authority);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Artic
CtEDO 2020-09-17
0,95
CASE OF GRUBNYK v. UKRAINE - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of Art
CtEDO 2012-01-19
0,95
CASE OF KORNEYKOVA v. UKRAINE
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonably necessary to prevent fleeing;Reasonably necessary to prevent offence);Violation of Article 5
CtEDO 2020-09-17
0,95
CASE OF GRUBNYK v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of Art
CtEDO 2015-10-15
0,94
CASE OF BELOZOROV v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE
Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Liberty of person;Security of person;Article 5-1-f - Extradition) (Ukra
Sursă