Velted-98 Ad împotriva Bulgariei

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2012)159 [1] Velted-98 AD împotriva Bulgariei Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (Recherche n 15239/02, Hotărârea din 11 decembrie 2008, definitivă la 11 martie 2009) Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede că el supraveghează executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumite în continuare "menționate mai jos " Convenția" și "Curtea"), Având în vedere hotărârea definitivă, care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului în cauza de mai sus și încălcarea constatată (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012) 909E [2] care reamintește obligația statului pârât, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (3) (1) din Convenție, să se conformeze hotărârilor definitive în litigiile la care este parte și că această obligație implică, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte, adoptarea de către autoritățile din statul membru în cauză, dacă este necesar de măsuri individuale pentru a pune capăt încălcărilor constatate și pentru a elimina consecințele acestora, în măsura posibilului de către Restitutio in integrum ; și măsuri generale de prevenire a unor încălcări similare ;

Am invitat guvernul statului pârât să informeze Comitetul cu privire la măsurile luate pentru a se conforma obligațiilor menționate anterior După examinarea bilanțului de acțiune furnizat de guvern care indică măsurile adoptate în vederea executării hotărârii judecătorești, inclusiv informațiile furnizate în ceea ce privește plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012) CINEVA fiind asigurat că au fost adoptate toate măsurile prevăzute la art. 46 alineatul (1); DECLAMENTUL PE CARE își îndeplinește funcțiile în temeiul art. 46 alin. (2) din Convenție în această cauză și DECIDE d'în . ACȚIUNE REPORT Case Velted-98 AD v. Bulgaria Application No 15239/02, Judgment of 11/12/2008 final on 11/03/2009 1. Convenție violare found Caseta se referă la unfairness of administrative procesing brought by the aplicant company seeking revocation of aministerial decree relating to the privatsion of a public company for which it had un succesorfully submitted a bid.

The Court held that there is abreach of Article 6§1of the Convention. The European Court observad that in its judgment of 19/10/2001 the five-member panel of the Supreme Administrative Court had failed to examinarea an issued as substantial at first instance by the three-member panel of the same scurt and on which the partis had exhaustivly commented. 2. Individual measures The Republic of Bulgaria has paid to the aplicant company on 12.05.2010 the amount of 2000 (two thousand) euro for pecuniary damages and 700 (seven hundred) euro for costs and expenses, converted into Bulgarian levs, acording to the operative part of the judgment. In 2009 the aplicant filed an application for the anulment of a final judgment before the Supreme Administrative Court.

Administrative procedures have been initiated before a seven-member panel, but they were discontinued due to the withdrawal of the anulment request by the aplicant. In these circumstances, no furtheral measures seem to be necessary. 3. The government is of the parend that the încălcarea found by the European Court stems from the object of the Supreme Administrative Court to examined all the questions in this particular case. Therefore, this violation can be considered as an izolated one. a) publication and disemination of the judgment The translation of the judgment is available on the Ministry of Justice website att http://www.justice.government.bg/The translation of the judgment was simte to the Supreme Administrative Court drawing their atention on the main conclusion of the ECHUR.b) No other general Measures, such as legislative amendments, seem to be necessary for the execution of the judgment.

[1] Adoptată de Comitetul miniștrilor la 6 decembrie 2012 în cadrul celei de-a 1157-a ședințe a delegaților miniștrilor. [2] Numai în limba engleză

Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)159 [1] Velted-98 AD contre Bulgarie Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (Requête n o 15239/02, arrêt du 11 décembre 2008, définitif le 11 mars 2009) Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit qu’il surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées « la Convention » et « la Cour »), Vu l’arrêt définitif, qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité dans l’affaire ci-dessus et la violation constatée (voir document DH-DD(2012)909E ) [2] ; Rappelant l’obligation de l’Etat défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels il est partie et que cette obligation implique, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour, l’adoption par les autorités de l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire : - de mesures individuelles pour mettre fin aux violations constatées et en effacer les conséquences, dans la mesure du possible par restitutio in integrum ; et - de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ; Ayant invité le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur à informer le Comité des mesures prises pour se conformer aux obligations susmentionnées ;

Ayant examiné le bilan d’action fourni par le Gouvernement indiquant les mesures adoptées afin d’exécuter l’arrêt y compris les informations fournies en ce qui concerne le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour (voir document DH-DD(2012)909E ) ; S’étant assuré que toutes les mesures requises par l’article 46, paragraphe 1, ont été adoptées ; DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.

ACTION REPORT

Case Velted-98 AD v. Bulgaria Application No 15239/02, Judgment of 11/12/2008, Final on 11 /03/2009 1. Convention violation found The case concerns the unfairness of administrative proceedings brought by the applicant company seeking revocation of a ministerial decree relating to the privatisation of a public company for which it had unsuccessfully submitted a bid. The Court held that there is a breach of Article 6§1of the Convention. The European Court observed that in its judgment of 19/10/2001 the five-member panel of the Supreme Administrative Court had failed to examine an issue qualified as substantial at first instance by the three-member panel of the same court and on which the parties had exhaustively commented.

2. Individual measures The Republic of Bulgaria has paid to the applicant company on 12.05.2010 the amount of 2000 (two thousand) euros for pecuniary damages and 700 (seven hundred) euros for costs and expenses, converted into Bulgarian levs, according to the operative part of the judgment. In 2009 the applicant filed an application for the annulment of a final judgment before the Supreme Administrative Court. Administrative proceedings have been initiated before a seven-member panel, but they were discontinued due to the withdrawal of the annulment request by the applicant. In these circumstances, no further individual measures seem to be necessary. 3. General measures The government is of the opinion that the violation found by the European Court stems from the omission of the Supreme Administrative Court to examine all the relevant questions in this particular case.

Therefore, this violation can be considered as an isolated one. a) publication and dissemination of the judgment The translation of the judgment is available on the Ministry of Justice website at http://www.justice.government.bg/ The translation of the judgment was sent to the Supreme Administrative Court drawing their attention on the main conclusions of the ECHR’s judgment. b) No other general measures, such as legislative amendments, seem to be necessary for the execution of the judgment. [1] Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 6 décembre 2012 lors de la 1157e réunion des Délégués des Ministres. [2] En anglais uniquement