AFFAIRE CAPITANI ET CAMPANELLA ET 2 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE L'ITALIE

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2013)63 Trei cauze împotriva Italiei (Capitani și Campanella, Paleari și Pozzi) Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (Recherche n 24920/07, Hotărârea din 17/05/2011, definitivă la 17/08/2011 Cerere nr. 55772/08, Hotărârea din 26/07/2011 Cerere nr 55743/08, Hotărârea din 26/07/2011) (adoptată de Comitetul de Miniștri la 30 aprilie 2013, la cea de-a 1169-a reuniune a delegaților miniștrilor) Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede monitorizarea de către Comitet a executării hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumite în continuare "Convenția" și "Curtea"), Având în vedere hotărârile definitive, care au fost transmise de Curte Comitetului în cauzele de mai sus și încălcările constatate reamintind obligația statului pârât, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (1) (1) din Convenție, să se conformeze hotărârilor definitive în litigiile la care este parte și că această obligație implică, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte, adoptarea de către autoritățile din statul membru în cauză, dacă este necesar de măsuri individuale pentru a pune capăt încălcărilor constatate și pentru a elimina consecințele acestora, în măsura posibilului de către Restitutio in integrum de măsuri generale de prevenire a unor încălcări similare ; Am invitat guvernul statului pârât să informeze Comitetul cu privire la măsurile luate pentru a se conforma obligației După examinarea bilanțului de acțiune furnizat de guvern care indică măsurile adoptate pentru a executa hotărârile, inclusiv informațiile furnizate în ceea ce privește plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte în cauzele Paleari și Pozzi (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2013)170E Având în vedere că toate măsurile impuse de art. 46 alineatul (1) au fost adoptate, DECURSĂ că își îndeplinește funcțiile în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția în aceste cazuri și DECIDE de la . Revised acțiune report (numai în limba engleză) Cases of - PALEARI v. ITALY, Application No. 55772/08, final on 26 July 2011; - POZZI v. ITALY, Cererea nr. 55743/08, final on 26 July 2011; - CAPITANI and CAMPANELLA v. ITALY, Application No. 24920/07, final on 17 August 2011. Cases summary Impossibility to request a public hearing in proceedings for the application of preventive measures placed at the seizure and confiscation of property and movable assets of the aplications (Cases of Paleari and of Capitani and Campanella) or of the applicicants company (Case of Pozzi), due to suspects of membership of a criminal organization (violations of Article 6, paragraph 1). These cases prezent similarities with the group of cases Bocellari and Rizza, Bongiorno and others, Leone, Perre and others against Italy, closed by final Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)123. [1] Individual Measures - Just satisfaction The European Court awarded 3 000 EUR to each applicant in the cases of Paleari and of Pozzi, for costs and expenses. No just satisfaction was awarded in the case of Capitani and Campanella. Just satisfaction was paid on 13 decembrie 2011. - Other individual Measures: The Court held that the find of the încălcarea Constituted in itself sucient just satisfaction for the non-Itself Pecuniary damage sustained by the aplicants. A priviri pecuniare damages, the Court found no caustal link between the violare and the damages claimed. It should be noted that the applicants did participate in the proceseding folowing those at issue, which resulted in the confiscation of many asets, together with the public prosecutor. in addition, two levels of judicion decided on the merits of each case. No further individual measures are prin urmare necessary. General measures Reference is made to the general measures adopted in the above mentioned group of cases Bocellari and Rizza, Bongiorno and others, Leone, Perre and others against Italy, already closed by final Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)123. Concluzie The government considers that no further individual and general measure are required in this case and that Italy has thus compliment with its obligations under Articol 46, paragraph 1, of the convention. [1]Adoptat de Comitetul de Ministeri on 14 September 2011 at the 1120th miting of the Ministers

Résolution CM/ResDH(2013)63

Trois affaires contre Italie (Capitani et Campanella, Paleari et Pozzi)

Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme

(Requête n

o

24920/07, arrêt du 17/05/2011, définitif le 17/08/2011

Requête n

o

55772/08, arrêt du 26/07/2011

Requête n

o

55743/08, arrêt du 26/07/2011)

(adoptée par le Comité de Ministres le 30 avril 2013,

lors de la 1169e réunion des Délégués des Ministres)

Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit que le Comité surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «

la Convention

» et «

la Cour

»),

Vu les arrêts définitifs, qui ont été transmis par la Cour au Comité dans les affaires ci-dessus et les violations constatées

;

Rappelant l’obligation de l’Etat défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe

1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels il est partie et que cette obligation implique, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour, l’adoption par les autorités de l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire

:

-

de mesures individuelles pour mettre fin aux violations constatées et en effacer les conséquences, dans la mesure du possible par

restitutio in integrum

;

et

-

de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ;

Ayant invité le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur à informer le Comité des mesures prises pour se conformer à l’obligation susmentionnée

;

Ayant examiné le bilan d’action fourni par le gouvernement indiquant les mesures adoptées afin d’exécuter les arrêts y compris les informations fournies en ce qui concerne le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour dans les affaires Paleari et Pozzi (voir document document

DH-DD(2013)170E

)

;

S’étant assuré que toutes les mesures requises par l’article 46, paragraphe 1, ont été adoptées,

DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans ces affaires et

DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.

Revised action report

(anglais seulement)

Cases of

- PALEARI v. ITALY,

Application No. 55772/08, final on 26 July 2011;

- POZZI v. ITALY,

Application No. 55743/08, final on 26 July 2011;

- CAPITANI and CAMPANELLA v. ITALY,

Application No. 24920/07, final on 17 August 2011.

Cases summary

Impossibility to request a public hearing in proceedings for the application of preventive measures aimed at the seizure and confiscation of property and movable assets of the applicants (cases of Paleari and of Capitani and Campanella) or of the applicant’s company (case of Pozzi), due to suspicions of membership of a criminal organisation (violations of Article 6, paragraph 1).

These cases present similarities with the group of cases Bocellari and Rizza, Bongiorno and others, Leone, Perre and others against Italy, closed by final Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)123.

[1]

Individual measures

- Just satisfaction

The European Court awarded 3 000 euros to each applicant in the cases of Paleari and of Pozzi, for costs and expenses. No just satisfaction was awarded in the case of Capitani and Campanella.

Just satisfaction was paid on 13 December 2011.

- Other individual measures:

The Court held that the finding of the violation constituted in itself sufficient just satisfaction for the non

‑

pecuniary damage sustained by the applicants. As regards pecuniary damages, the Court found no causal link between the violation and the damages claimed.

It should be noted that the applicants did participate in the proceedings following those at issue, which resulted in the confiscation of many assets, together with the public prosecutor. In addition, two levels of jurisdiction decided on the merits of each case.

No further individual measures are therefore necessary.

General measures

Reference is made to the general measures adopted in the above mentioned group of cases Bocellari and Rizza, Bongiorno and others, Leone, Perre and others against Italy, already closed by final Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)123.

Conclusion

The government considers that no further individual and general measure are required in this case and that Italy has thus complied with its obligations under Article

46, paragraph 1, of the Convention.

[1]

Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 September 2011 at the 1120th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.