AFFAIRE HANDÖLSDALEN SAMI VILLAGE ET AUTRES CONTRE LA SUÈDE

Cea de-a 1173-a reuniune precum 11-12 iunie 2013 Anexa 4 (Punctul H46-1) Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2013)118 Handölsdalen Sami Village și alții împotriva Suediei Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (Cercetarea nr. 39013/04, Hotărârea din 30 martie 2010, definitivă la 30 iunie 2010) (adoptată de Comitetul de Miniștri la 11 iunie 2013, cu ocazia celei de-a 1173-a ședințe a Delegaților de Miniștri) Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede ca Comitetul să supravegheze executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumite în continuare "convenția" și "Curtea"), Având în vedere hotărârea definitivă care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului în cauza de mai sus și încălcarea constatată; reamintind obligația statului pârât în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (1) (1) din Convenție, să se conformeze hotărârilor definitive în litigiile la care este parte și că această obligație implică, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte, adoptarea de către autoritățile din statul membru în cauză, dacă este necesar de măsuri individuale pentru a pune capăt încălcărilor constatate și pentru a elimina consecințele acestora, în măsura posibilului de către Restitutio in integrum de măsuri generale de prevenire a unor încălcări similare ; Am invitat guvernul statului pârât să informeze Comitetul cu privire la măsurile luate pentru a se conforma obligației După examinarea bilanțului de acțiune furnizat de guvern care indică măsurile adoptate în vederea executării hotărârii judecătorești, inclusiv informațiile furnizate în ceea ce privește plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2013) 589), având în vedere faptul că au fost adoptate toate măsurile prevăzute la art. 46 alineatul (1), DECLAMENTUL pe care și l-a îndeplinit în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenție în această cauză și DECIDE dÂn . Acțiune reporting the case of Handölsdalen Sami sat and others against Sweden (Application No. 39013/04) (numai în limba engleză) The European Court of Human Rights delivered a judgment in the above-mented case on 30 March 2010. The Court found a violation of Article 6§1 of the Convention on account of the excesiv length of domestic civil procesing proceseding land dispute, which began on 20 September 1990 and ended on 29 April 2004. It held that Sweden was to pay to the aplicants €25 000 in respect of pecuniary damage, €14 000 in respect of moraly damage and €15 000 (inclusiv VAT) in respect of costs and expenses. Sweden was also to pay any tax that may be încarcable on the above amounts. The amounts were to be converted into Swedish kronor (SEK) at the rate applicable at the data of settlement. Payment was to be made within three months from the data on which the judgment been taken as result of the judgment. Individual measures on 4 October 2010. The just satisfaction award of € 25 000 in respect of pecuniary damage and €14000 in respect of non pecuniary damage was paid by the government in equal parts to the cuptor aplicants on 23 decembrie 2010 and evidence has been implored. Cuth revis to the award for costs and expenses of €15 000, payment was made to three of the aplicants on 30 decembrie 2010. The payment to the furth applicant was made on 28 April 2011, i.e. after the expiry of the time limitated precribed in the judgment, due to the applicant applicence in transmitting the necessary information priving the bank account to use and despite regular reminders by the government to the appicants counsel. The government prin urmare holds that no default should be paid to the furth applicicant, whose counsel agreed with this concluzie. No other individual measure is necessary sinence the process in interogare are closed and the damage suffered by the aplicants compensated. General measures The judgment of the Court has been publicished and disseminated. A reportat containing a summary of the judgment in Swedish, with copies of the judgment as well as the decision attached, has been simte to relevant domesticy scurts and authorities included the Courts directly involved in the case, the Swedish National Courts Administration, the Bar Association, the Chancellor of Justice and the Parliamentary Ombudsmen. The judgment in English and a summary of it in Swedish has also been publicutshed on the Swedish National Courts pesite www.domstol.se (see Nyttt från Europadomstolen 4 2010), and the governments uman rights website www.manskligarattigheter.gov.se/www.humanrights.gov.se. Summary To conclude, the government holds that it has taken all the measures required as a result of the Court

1173e réunion – 11-12 juin 2013

Annexe 4

(Point H46-1)

Résolution CM/ResDH(2013)118

Handölsdalen Sami Village et autres contre la Suède

Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme

(Requête n° 39013/04, arrêt du 30 mars 2010, définitif le 30 juin 2010)

(adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 11 juin 2013,

lors de la 1173e réunion des Délégués des Ministres)

Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit que le Comité surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «

la Convention

» et «

la Cour

»),

Vu l’arrêt définitif qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité dans l’affaire ci-dessus et la violation constatée ;

Rappelant l’obligation de l’Etat défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe

1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels il est partie et que cette obligation implique, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour, l’adoption par les autorités de l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire

:

-

de mesures individuelles pour mettre fin aux violations constatées et en effacer les conséquences, dans la mesure du possible par

restitutio in integrum

;

et

-

de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ;

Ayant invité le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur à informer le Comité des mesures prises pour se conformer à l’obligation susmentionnée

;

Ayant examiné le bilan d’action fourni par le gouvernement indiquant les mesures adoptées afin d’exécuter l’arrêt y compris les informations fournies en ce qui concerne le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour (voir document DH-DD(2013)589)

;

S’étant assuré que toutes les mesures requises par l’article 46, paragraphe 1, ont été adoptées,

DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et

DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.

Action report

concerning the case of Handölsdalen Sami village and others against Sweden

(Application No. 39013/04)

(Anglais seulement)

The European Court of Human Rights delivered a judgment in the above-mentioned case on 30 March 2010. The Court found a violation of Article 6§1 of the Convention on account of the excessive length of domestic civil proceedings concerning land dispute, which began on 20 September 1990 and ended on 29 April 2004. It held that Sweden was to pay to the applicants €25

000 in respect of pecuniary damage, €14

000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage and €15 000 (including VAT) in respect of costs and expenses. Sweden was also to pay any tax that may be chargeable on the above amounts. The amounts were to be converted into Swedish

kronor

(SEK) at the rate applicable at the date of settlement. Payment was to be made within three months from the date on which the judgment became final in accordance with Article 44§2 of the Convention. The judgment became final on 4 October 2010.

The following measures have been taken as a result of the judgment.

Individual measures

The just satisfaction award of €25 000 in respect of pecuniary damage and €14 000 in respect of non

‑

pecuniary damage was paid by the government in equal parts to the four applicants on 23

December

2010 and evidence has been supplied.

With regard to the award for costs and expenses of €15 000, payment was made to three of the applicants on 30 December 2010. The payment to the fourth applicant was made on 28 April 2011, i.e. after the expiry of the time limit prescribed in the judgment, due to the applicant’s negligence in transmitting the necessary information concerning the bank account to use and despite regular reminders by the government to the applicant’s counsel. The government therefore holds that no default interest should be paid to the fourth applicant, whose counsel agreed with this conclusion.

No other individual measure is necessary since the proceedings in question are closed and the damage suffered by the applicants compensated.

General measures

The judgment of the Court has been published and disseminated. A report containing a summary of the judgment in Swedish, with copies of the judgment as well as the decision attached, has been sent to relevant domestic courts and authorities including the courts directly involved in the case, the Swedish National Courts Administration, the Bar Association, the Chancellor of Justice and the Parliamentary Ombudsmen. The judgment in English and a summary of it in Swedish has also been published on the Swedish National Courts Administration’s website www.domstol.se (see

Nytt från Europadomstolen

4 2010), and the government’s human rights website www.manskligarattigheter.gov.se /www.humanrights.gov.se.

Summary

To conclude, the government holds that it has taken all the measures required as a result of the Court’s judgment in the present case and has thus complied with its obligations under Article

46§1 of the Convention. The government therefore looks forward to the Committee’s decision to close the examination of this case.